MetaCap

AES (AES) vs IDACORP (IDA)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

AES (AES) has outperformed IDACORP (IDA) over the past year, gaining 3.7% versus a loss of 1.2%. Over five years, IDA leads with a +25.5% price change compared with -38.8% for AES. AES is the larger company by market cap ($10.65 billion vs $7.64 billion), about 1.4 times the size.

On valuation, AES trades at a lower forward P/E (6.3x vs 19.0x for IDACORP). AES offers the higher dividend yield (4.72% vs 2.65%). IDACORP converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.5% versus 7.4%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

AES+3.68%IDA-1.24%
+21%+7%-8%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
AES-37.97%IDA+29.81%
+57%-3%-64%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

AES versus IDA key metrics
MetricAESIDA
Share price$14.93$132.04
Market cap$10.65B$7.64B
1-day change0.00%-0.48%
YTD return+4.11%+4.33%
1-year return+3.68%-1.24%
5-year return-38.84%+25.47%
P/E ratio (TTM)5.5921.90
Forward P/E6.3018.99
EPS (TTM)$2.67$6.03
Dividend yield4.72%2.65%
Annual dividend$0.704$3.50
Revenue (latest FY)$12.23B$1.75B
Revenue growth (YoY)-0.37%-1.24%
Net income (latest FY)$910.00M$323.47M
Gross margin18.07%—
Operating margin—20.26%
Net margin7.44%18.52%
52-week high$17.65$154.91
52-week low$13.21$124.12
Distance from 52-week high-15.41%-14.76%
Analyst consensusholdbuy
Avg. price target upside+0.47%+19.15%
Average volume7.84M536.95K
Shares outstanding713.44M57.84M
Employees8,3362,174
SectorIndustrialsUtilities
IndustryElectric Utilities: CentralElectric Utilities: Central

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • IDACORP trades at a higher earnings multiple (21.9x vs 5.6x trailing P/E).
  • AES offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.72% vs 2.65%).
  • IDACORP is more profitable, keeping 18.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 7.4 cents for AES.
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: AES in Industrials and IDACORP in Utilities.

About AES

AES stock →

The AES Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a power generation and utility company. It operates through four segments: Renewables, Utilities, Energy Infrastructure, and New Energy Technologies.

Industrials · Electric Utilities: Central · 8,336 employees

About IDACORP

IDA stock →

IDACORP, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the generation, transmission, distribution, purchase, and sale of electric energy in the United States. The company operates 17 hydropower generating plants located in southern Idaho and eastern Oregon; and three natural gas-fired plants situated in southern Idaho, as well as interests in a coal-fired and natural gas-fired steam generating plant located in Wyoming; and interests in a coal-fired steam generating plant situated in Nevada.

Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central · 2,174 employees

AES vs IDA FAQ

Which is bigger, AES or IDACORP?

AES (AES) is larger, with a market capitalization of $10.65B compared with $7.64B for IDACORP (IDA).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, AES or IDA?

AES returned +3.68% over the past 12 months, compared with -1.24% for IDA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, AES or IDA?

AES has the lower trailing P/E at 5.6, versus 21.9 for IDA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, AES or IDACORP?

AES has the higher yield at 4.72%, compared with 2.65% for IDACORP.

Are AES and IDACORP in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Electric Utilities: Central industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons