AST SpaceMobile (ASTS) vs EchoStar (ECHO)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
EchoStar (ECHO) has outperformed AST SpaceMobile (ASTS) over the past year, gaining 29.9% versus a loss of 18.9%. Over five years, ASTS leads with a +494.0% price change compared with +284.2% for ECHO. EchoStar is the larger company by market cap ($28.41 billion vs $23.60 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while AST SpaceMobile is growing revenue faster (+1511.8% vs -5.2%).
EchoStar converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of -96.6% versus -482.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ASTS | ECHO |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $60.65 | $97.69 |
| Market cap | $23.60B | $28.41B |
| 1-day change | -3.91% | -2.32% |
| YTD return | -16.49% | -10.13% |
| 1-year return | -18.86% | +29.94% |
| 5-year return | +494.03% | +284.15% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.30 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-2.13 | $-24.77 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $70.92M | $15.00B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +1511.77% | -5.18% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-341.94M | $-14.50B |
| Gross margin | — | 37.05% |
| Operating margin | — | -118.12% |
| Net margin | -482.16% | -96.62% |
| 52-week high | $133.86 | $147.25 |
| 52-week low | $49.31 | $65.76 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -54.69% | -33.66% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +28.51% | +34.55% |
| Average volume | 12.09M | 3.97M |
| Shares outstanding | 299.79M | 159.47M |
| Employees | 1,126 | 12,100 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Telecommunications Equipment | Telecommunications Equipment |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ECHO has outperformed ASTS by 48.8 percentage points over the past year.
- EchoStar is more profitable, keeping -96.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -482.2 cents for AST SpaceMobile.
- AST SpaceMobile grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+1511.77% vs -5.18%).
About AST SpaceMobile
ASTS stock →AST SpaceMobile, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs and develops the constellation of BlueBird satellites in the United States. The company provides a cellular broadband network in space to be accessible directly by smartphones for commercial use and other applications, as well as for government use.
Consumer Discretionary · Telecommunications Equipment · 1,126 employees
About EchoStar
ECHO stock →EchoStar Corporation provides pay-tv services in the United States, Mexico, Canada, South and Central America, Asia, Africa, Australia, Europe, India, and the Middle East. The Pay-TV segment offers a direct broadcast and fixed satellite, owned and leased satellites, leased fiber optic networks, in-home services, and call center operation services; digital broadcast operations, including satellite uplinking/downlinking, transmission and, other services to third-party pay-TV providers; multichannel, live-linear and on-demand streaming over-the-top Internet-based domestic, international, Latino, and Freestream video programming services; and receiver systems.
Consumer Discretionary · Telecommunications Equipment · 12,100 employees
ASTS vs ECHO FAQ
Which is bigger, AST SpaceMobile or EchoStar?
EchoStar (ECHO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $28.41B compared with $23.60B for AST SpaceMobile (ASTS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ASTS or ECHO?
ECHO returned +29.94% over the past 12 months, compared with -18.86% for ASTS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are AST SpaceMobile and EchoStar in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Telecommunications Equipment industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.