MetaCap

ATS (ATS) vs Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC) has outperformed ATS (ATS) over the past year, losing 11.9% versus a loss of 32.7%. Over five years, EPAC leads with a +76.3% price change compared with -48.4% for ATS. Enerpac Tool Group is the larger company by market cap ($1.81 billion vs $1.74 billion), about 1.0 times the size.

On valuation, ATS trades at a lower forward P/E (13.0x vs 17.0x for Enerpac Tool Group). Enerpac Tool Group pays a dividend yielding 0.11%, while ATS does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ATS-33.67%EPAC-13.49%
+36%-1%-37%
Oct 6, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ATS-47.41%EPAC+70.29%
+157%+50%-57%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ATS versus EPAC key metrics
MetricATSEPAC
Share price$17.75$35.08
Market cap$1.74B$1.81B
1-day change-2.74%-1.74%
YTD return-35.55%-8.26%
1-year return-32.69%-11.95%
5-year return-48.36%+76.28%
P/E ratio (TTM)50.7119.93
Forward P/E13.0317.03
EPS (TTM)$0.35$1.76
Dividend yield0.00%0.11%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.04
52-week high$35.82$45.00
52-week low$17.61$32.35
Distance from 52-week high-50.45%-22.04%
Analyst consensusbuynone
Avg. price target upside—+36.83%
Average volume243.93K460.29K
Shares outstanding98.13M51.54M
Employees7,0002,100
SectorIndustrialsTechnology
IndustryIndustrial Machinery/ComponentsIndustrial Machinery/Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • EPAC has outperformed ATS by 20.7 percentage points over the past year.
  • ATS trades at a higher earnings multiple (50.7x vs 19.9x trailing P/E).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: ATS in Industrials and Enerpac Tool Group in Technology.

About ATS

ATS stock →

ATS Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the planning, designing, building, commissioning, and servicing of automated manufacturing and assembly systems worldwide. The company offers pre-automation services comprising discovery and analysis, concept development, simulation, and total cost of ownership modeling; post-automation services, including training, process optimization, preventive maintenance, emergency and on-call support, spare parts, retooling, retrofits, and equipment relocation; and contract manufacturing services, as well as after-sales services.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 7,000 employees

About Enerpac Tool Group

EPAC stock →

Enerpac Tool Group Corp. manufactures and sells a range of industrial products and solutions in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, Canada, China, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, France, the Netherlands, and internationally.

Technology · Industrial Machinery/Components · 2,100 employees

ATS vs EPAC FAQ

Which is bigger, ATS or Enerpac Tool Group?

Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.81B compared with $1.74B for ATS (ATS).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ATS or EPAC?

EPAC returned -11.95% over the past 12 months, compared with -32.69% for ATS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ATS or EPAC?

EPAC has the lower trailing P/E at 19.9, versus 50.7 for ATS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, ATS or Enerpac Tool Group?

Enerpac Tool Group pays a dividend yielding 0.11%, while ATS does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are ATS and Enerpac Tool Group in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons