Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) vs NetEase (NTES)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) has outperformed NetEase (NTES) over the past year, gaining 3.1% versus a loss of 19.4%. Over five years, CDNS leads with a +130.7% price change compared with +26.2% for NTES. Cadence Design Systems is the larger company by market cap ($98.07 billion vs $77.23 billion), about 1.3 times the size.
On valuation, NetEase trades at a lower forward P/E (11.2x vs 37.2x for Cadence Design Systems). NetEase pays a dividend yielding 3.32%, while Cadence Design Systems does not currently pay one. NetEase converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 30.9% versus 20.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CDNS | NTES |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $356.12 | $120.61 |
| Market cap | $98.07B | $77.23B |
| 1-day change | -0.95% | +1.29% |
| YTD return | +13.93% | -12.36% |
| 1-year return | +3.08% | -19.37% |
| 5-year return | +130.73% | +26.21% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 70.80 | 16.75 |
| Forward P/E | 37.22 | 11.21 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.03 | $7.20 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.32% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $4.01 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $5.30B | $16.11B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +14.12% | +11.65% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.11B | $4.98B |
| Gross margin | — | 64.29% |
| Operating margin | 28.17% | 31.82% |
| Net margin | 20.94% | 30.90% |
| 52-week high | $416.69 | $156.44 |
| 52-week low | $262.75 | $106.06 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -14.54% | -22.90% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +14.07% | +35.00% |
| Average volume | 2.39M | 794.89K |
| Shares outstanding | 275.39M | 640.33M |
| Employees | 15,445 | 25,382 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Computer Software: Prepackaged Software | Computer Software: Prepackaged Software |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CDNS has outperformed NTES by 22.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Cadence Design Systems trades at a higher earnings multiple (70.8x vs 16.8x trailing P/E).
- NetEase offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.32% vs 0.00%).
- NetEase is more profitable, keeping 30.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 20.9 cents for Cadence Design Systems.
About Cadence Design Systems
CDNS stock →Cadence Design Systems, Inc. develops computational, AI-driven software, hardware, and silicon intellectual property products and solutions.
Technology · Computer Software: Prepackaged Software · 15,445 employees
About NetEase
NTES stock →NetEase, Inc. engages in online games, music streaming, online intelligent learning services, and internet content services businesses in China and internationally.
Technology · Computer Software: Prepackaged Software · 25,382 employees
CDNS vs NTES FAQ
Which is bigger, Cadence Design Systems or NetEase?
Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $98.07B compared with $77.23B for NetEase (NTES).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CDNS or NTES?
CDNS returned +3.08% over the past 12 months, compared with -19.37% for NTES (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CDNS or NTES?
NTES has the lower trailing P/E at 16.8, versus 70.8 for CDNS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Cadence Design Systems or NetEase?
NetEase pays a dividend yielding 3.32%, while Cadence Design Systems does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Cadence Design Systems and NetEase in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Computer Software: Prepackaged Software industry within the Technology sector.