Celanese (CE) vs Sensient Technologies (SXT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Sensient Technologies (SXT) has outperformed Celanese (CE) over the past year, gaining 42.9% versus a gain of 2.9%. Over five years, SXT leads with a +37.2% price change compared with -73.4% for CE. Sensient Technologies is the larger company by market cap ($5.62 billion vs $4.81 billion), about 1.2 times the size.
On valuation, Celanese trades at a lower forward P/E (7.1x vs 26.4x for Sensient Technologies). Sensient Technologies offers the higher dividend yield (1.24% vs 0.27%). Sensient Technologies converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.3% versus -12.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CE | SXT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $43.86 | $132.00 |
| Market cap | $4.81B | $5.62B |
| 1-day change | -2.21% | -0.68% |
| YTD return | +3.74% | +40.50% |
| 1-year return | +2.93% | +42.95% |
| 5-year return | -73.38% | +37.20% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 35.58 |
| Forward P/E | 7.14 | 26.43 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-10.60 | $3.71 |
| Dividend yield | 0.27% | 1.24% |
| Annual dividend | $0.12 | $1.64 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $9.54B | $1.61B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -7.05% | +3.52% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-1.17B | $134.49M |
| Gross margin | 20.45% | 33.45% |
| Operating margin | -8.24% | 12.85% |
| Net margin | -12.21% | 8.34% |
| 52-week high | $70.70 | $138.82 |
| 52-week low | $35.13 | $82.60 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -37.96% | -4.91% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +44.19% | +9.39% |
| Average volume | 1.81M | 426.57K |
| Shares outstanding | 109.75M | 42.56M |
| Employees | 11,000 | 4,070 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Major Chemicals | Major Chemicals |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- SXT has outperformed CE by 40.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Sensient Technologies is more profitable, keeping 8.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -12.2 cents for Celanese.
- Sensient Technologies grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+3.52% vs -7.05%).
About Celanese
CE stock →Celanese Corporation produces and sells engineered polymers worldwide. It operates through Engineered Materials and Acetyl Chain segments.
Industrials · Major Chemicals · 11,000 employees
About Sensient Technologies
SXT stock →Sensient Technologies Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and markets colors, flavors, and other specialty ingredients worldwide. It operates in three segments: Flavors & Extracts, Color, and Asia Pacific.
Industrials · Major Chemicals · 4,070 employees
CE vs SXT FAQ
Which is bigger, Celanese or Sensient Technologies?
Sensient Technologies (SXT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.62B compared with $4.81B for Celanese (CE).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CE or SXT?
SXT returned +42.95% over the past 12 months, compared with +2.93% for CE (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Celanese or Sensient Technologies?
Sensient Technologies has the higher yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.27% for Celanese.
Are Celanese and Sensient Technologies in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Major Chemicals industry within the Industrials sector.