MetaCap

CMS Energy (CMS) vs CenterPoint Energy (Holding) (CNP)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

CenterPoint Energy (Holding) (CNP) has outperformed CMS Energy (CMS) over the past year, losing 2.3% versus a loss of 11.8%. Over five years, CNP leads with a +44.5% price change compared with +8.3% for CMS. CenterPoint Energy (Holding) is the larger company by market cap ($25.38 billion vs $20.40 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while CMS Energy is growing revenue faster (+13.6% vs +8.3%).

On valuation, CMS Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (15.7x vs 18.5x for CenterPoint Energy (Holding)). CMS Energy offers the higher dividend yield (3.42% vs 2.34%). CMS Energy converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 12.5% versus 11.2%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CMS-11.13%CNP-2.36%
+16%-0%-16%
Oct 6, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CMS+8.56%CNP+51.37%
+81%+32%-16%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CMS versus CNP key metrics
MetricCMSCNP
Share price$65.07$38.53
Market cap$20.40B$25.38B
1-day change0.00%-0.08%
YTD return-6.95%+0.50%
1-year return-11.78%-2.28%
5-year return+8.29%+44.52%
P/E ratio (TTM)19.5422.80
Forward P/E15.6618.46
EPS (TTM)$3.33$1.69
Dividend yield3.42%2.34%
Annual dividend$2.23$0.90
Revenue (latest FY)$8.54B$9.36B
Revenue growth (YoY)+13.63%+8.26%
Net income (latest FY)$1.07B$1.05B
Gross margin—99.96%
Operating margin20.22%22.55%
Net margin12.54%11.24%
52-week high$80.36$45.26
52-week low$62.29$36.37
Distance from 52-week high-19.03%-14.87%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+19.23%+16.95%
Average volume3.71M6.40M
Shares outstanding313.58M658.72M
Employees8,3508,794
SectorUtilitiesUtilities
IndustryPower GenerationElectric Utilities: Central

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • CMS Energy offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.42% vs 2.34%).
  • CMS Energy grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+13.63% vs +8.26%).

About CMS Energy

CMS stock →

CMS Energy Corporation operates as an energy company primarily in Michigan. The company operates through three segments: Electric Utility; Gas Utility; and NorthStar Clean Energy.

Utilities · Power Generation · 8,350 employees

About CenterPoint Energy (Holding)

CNP stock →

CenterPoint Energy, Inc. operates as a public utility holding company in the United States.

Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central · 8,794 employees

CMS vs CNP FAQ

Which is bigger, CMS Energy or CenterPoint Energy (Holding)?

CenterPoint Energy (Holding) (CNP) is larger, with a market capitalization of $25.38B compared with $20.40B for CMS Energy (CMS).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CMS or CNP?

CNP returned -2.28% over the past 12 months, compared with -11.78% for CMS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CMS or CNP?

CMS has the lower trailing P/E at 19.5, versus 22.8 for CNP. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, CMS Energy or CenterPoint Energy (Holding)?

CMS Energy has the higher yield at 3.42%, compared with 2.34% for CenterPoint Energy (Holding).

Are CMS Energy and CenterPoint Energy (Holding) in the same industry?

Both are in the Utilities sector, but in different industries: Power Generation for CMS Energy and Electric Utilities: Central for CenterPoint Energy (Holding).

More comparisons