CMS Energy (CMS) vs Korea Electric Power (KEP)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
CMS Energy (CMS) has outperformed Korea Electric Power (KEP) over the past year, losing 11.8% versus a loss of 12.3%. Over five years, KEP leads with a +14.7% price change compared with +8.3% for CMS. CMS Energy is the larger company by market cap ($20.40 billion vs $14.29 billion), about 1.4 times the size.
On valuation, Korea Electric Power trades at a lower forward P/E (3.9x vs 15.7x for CMS Energy). Korea Electric Power offers the higher dividend yield (13854.45% vs 3.42%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CMS | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $65.07 | $11.13 |
| Market cap | $20.40B | $14.29B |
| 1-day change | 0.00% | -1.68% |
| YTD return | -6.95% | -32.52% |
| 1-year return | -11.78% | -12.32% |
| 5-year return | +8.29% | +14.74% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 19.54 | 2.64 |
| Forward P/E | 15.66 | 3.95 |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.33 | $4.21 |
| Dividend yield | 3.42% | 13854.45% |
| Annual dividend | $2.23 | $1,542.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $8.54B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +13.63% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.07B | — |
| Operating margin | 20.22% | — |
| Net margin | 12.54% | — |
| 52-week high | $80.36 | $23.41 |
| 52-week low | $62.29 | $10.78 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -19.03% | -52.46% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +19.23% | +34.77% |
| Average volume | 3.71M | 1.03M |
| Shares outstanding | 313.58M | 1.28B |
| Employees | 8,350 | 22,693 |
| Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
| Industry | Power Generation | Electric Utilities: Central |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CMS Energy trades at a higher earnings multiple (19.5x vs 2.6x trailing P/E).
- Korea Electric Power offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (13854.45% vs 3.42%).
About CMS Energy
CMS stock →CMS Energy Corporation operates as an energy company primarily in Michigan. The company operates through three segments: Electric Utility; Gas Utility; and NorthStar Clean Energy.
Utilities · Power Generation · 8,350 employees
About Korea Electric Power
KEP stock →Korea Electric Power Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity in South Korea and internationally. The company operates through five segments: Electricity Sales, Nuclear Power Generation, Thermal Power Generation, Power Support, and Other.
Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central · 22,693 employees
CMS vs KEP FAQ
Which is bigger, CMS Energy or Korea Electric Power?
CMS Energy (CMS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $20.40B compared with $14.29B for Korea Electric Power (KEP).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CMS or KEP?
CMS returned -11.78% over the past 12 months, compared with -12.32% for KEP (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CMS or KEP?
KEP has the lower trailing P/E at 2.6, versus 19.5 for CMS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, CMS Energy or Korea Electric Power?
Korea Electric Power has the higher yield at 13854.45%, compared with 3.42% for CMS Energy.
Are CMS Energy and Korea Electric Power in the same industry?
Both are in the Utilities sector, but in different industries: Power Generation for CMS Energy and Electric Utilities: Central for Korea Electric Power.