DoubleVerify (DV) vs Omnicom Group (OMC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
DoubleVerify (DV) has outperformed Omnicom Group (OMC) over the past year, gaining 20.3% versus a loss of 6.1%. Over five years, OMC leads with a -2.2% price change compared with -57.5% for DV. Omnicom Group is the larger company by market cap ($20.54 billion vs $2.11 billion), about 9.7 times the size.
On valuation, Omnicom Group trades at a lower forward P/E (6.4x vs 11.6x for DoubleVerify). Omnicom Group pays a dividend yielding 4.14%, while DoubleVerify does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | DV | OMC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $13.50 | $74.87 |
| Market cap | $2.11B | $20.54B |
| 1-day change | +0.15% | -0.31% |
| YTD return | +18.01% | -7.28% |
| 1-year return | +20.32% | -6.13% |
| 5-year return | -57.49% | -2.22% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 38.57 | 197.03 |
| Forward P/E | 11.65 | 6.42 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.35 | $0.38 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.14% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $3.10 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $17.27B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +10.09% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $-54.50M |
| Gross margin | — | 8.49% |
| Operating margin | — | 2.57% |
| Net margin | — | -0.32% |
| 52-week high | $13.65 | $89.57 |
| 52-week low | $7.64 | $66.33 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -1.10% | -16.41% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | -0.15% | +36.46% |
| Average volume | 3.55M | 2.89M |
| Shares outstanding | 156.18M | 274.35M |
| Employees | 1,231 | 120,000 |
| Sector | Technology | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Computer Software: Programming Data Processing | Advertising |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Omnicom Group is about 9.7 times larger than DoubleVerify by market value ($20.54B vs $2.11B).
- DV has outperformed OMC by 26.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Omnicom Group trades at a higher earnings multiple (197.0x vs 38.6x trailing P/E).
- Omnicom Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.14% vs 0.00%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: DoubleVerify in Technology and Omnicom Group in Consumer Discretionary.
About DoubleVerify
DV stock →DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. provides media effectiveness platforms in the United States.
Technology · Computer Software: Programming Data Processing · 1,231 employees
About Omnicom Group
OMC stock →Omnicom Group Inc., together with its subsidiaries, offers advertising, marketing, and corporate communications services. It provides a range of services in the areas of media and advertising, precision marketing, public relations, healthcare, branding and retail commerce, experiential, execution, and support.
Consumer Discretionary · Advertising · 120,000 employees
DV vs OMC FAQ
Which is bigger, DoubleVerify or Omnicom Group?
Omnicom Group (OMC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $20.54B compared with $2.11B for DoubleVerify (DV).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, DV or OMC?
DV returned +20.32% over the past 12 months, compared with -6.13% for OMC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, DV or OMC?
DV has the lower trailing P/E at 38.6, versus 197.0 for OMC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, DoubleVerify or Omnicom Group?
Omnicom Group pays a dividend yielding 4.14%, while DoubleVerify does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are DoubleVerify and Omnicom Group in the same industry?
No. DoubleVerify is in the Technology sector, while Omnicom Group is in Consumer Discretionary.