MetaCap

Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income (EFT) vs Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (11.7x vs 42.5x for Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income). Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income offers the higher dividend yield (9.42% vs 8.95%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

EFT versus NZF key metrics
MetricEFTNZF
Share price$10.62$10.66
Market cap—$2.09B
1-day change-0.38%-2.11%
YTD return-5.93%—
1-year return-9.85%—
5-year return-29.06%—
P/E ratio (TTM)42.4811.71
EPS (TTM)$0.25$0.91
Dividend yield9.42%8.95%
Annual dividend$1.00$0.954
52-week high$11.92$13.02
52-week low$10.31$10.45
Distance from 52-week high-10.91%-18.13%
Average volume112.86K835.30K
Shares outstanding—196.39M
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryFinance CompaniesFinance Companies

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income trades at a higher earnings multiple (42.5x vs 11.7x trailing P/E).

EFT vs NZF FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, EFT or NZF?

NZF has the lower trailing P/E at 11.7, versus 42.5 for EFT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income or Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund?

Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income has the higher yield at 9.42%, compared with 8.95% for Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund.

Are Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income and Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Finance Companies industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons