Estee Lauder Companies (EL) vs Interparfums (IPAR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Interparfums (IPAR) has outperformed Estee Lauder Companies (EL) over the past year, gaining 18.9% versus a gain of 2.4%. Over five years, IPAR leads with a +40.5% price change compared with -70.4% for EL. Estee Lauder Companies is the larger company by market cap ($34.22 billion vs $3.55 billion), about 9.6 times the size.
On valuation, Interparfums trades at a lower forward P/E (21.3x vs 24.1x for Estee Lauder Companies). Interparfums offers the higher dividend yield (2.88% vs 1.48%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | EL | IPAR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $94.45 | $111.00 |
| Market cap | $34.22B | $3.55B |
| 1-day change | +1.17% | -1.64% |
| YTD return | -9.39% | +31.50% |
| 1-year return | +2.38% | +18.91% |
| 5-year return | -70.42% | +40.51% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 188.90 | 21.18 |
| Forward P/E | 24.08 | 21.33 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.50 | $5.24 |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 2.88% |
| Annual dividend | $1.40 | $3.20 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $15.05B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +5.05% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $182.00M | — |
| Gross margin | 75.50% | — |
| Operating margin | 5.18% | — |
| Net margin | 1.21% | — |
| 52-week high | $121.64 | $129.29 |
| 52-week low | $66.22 | $77.21 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -22.35% | -14.15% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +13.65% | +13.96% |
| Average volume | 2.96M | 250.64K |
| Shares outstanding | 247.82M | 32.03M |
| Employees | 37,950 | 662 |
| Sector | Consumer Defensive | Consumer Defensive |
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Household & Personal Products |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Estee Lauder Companies is about 9.6 times larger than Interparfums by market value ($34.22B vs $3.55B).
- IPAR has outperformed EL by 16.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Estee Lauder Companies trades at a higher earnings multiple (188.9x vs 21.2x trailing P/E).
- Interparfums offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.88% vs 1.48%).
About Estee Lauder Companies
EL stock →The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. manufactures, markets, and sells skin care, makeup, fragrance, and hair care products worldwide.
Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products · 37,950 employees
About Interparfums
IPAR stock →Interparfums, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, manufactures, markets, and distributes a range of fragrances and fragrance related products in the United States and internationally. It operates in two segments, European Based Operations and United States Based Operations.
Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products · 662 employees
EL vs IPAR FAQ
Which is bigger, Estee Lauder Companies or Interparfums?
Estee Lauder Companies (EL) is larger, with a market capitalization of $34.22B compared with $3.55B for Interparfums (IPAR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, EL or IPAR?
IPAR returned +18.91% over the past 12 months, compared with +2.38% for EL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, EL or IPAR?
IPAR has the lower trailing P/E at 21.2, versus 188.9 for EL. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Estee Lauder Companies or Interparfums?
Interparfums has the higher yield at 2.88%, compared with 1.48% for Estee Lauder Companies.
Are Estee Lauder Companies and Interparfums in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Household & Personal Products industry within the Consumer Defensive sector.