TechnipFMC (FTI) vs Halliburton (HAL)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
TechnipFMC (FTI) has outperformed Halliburton (HAL) over the past year, gaining 79.0% versus a gain of 30.2%. Over five years, FTI leads with a +765.8% price change compared with +21.5% for HAL. TechnipFMC is the larger company by market cap ($26.82 billion vs $26.45 billion), about 1.0 times the size.
On valuation, Halliburton trades at a lower forward P/E (10.9x vs 18.9x for TechnipFMC). Halliburton offers the higher dividend yield (2.14% vs 0.29%). TechnipFMC converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 9.7% versus 5.8%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FTI | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $68.40 | $31.75 |
| Market cap | $26.82B | $26.45B |
| 1-day change | -2.13% | -2.96% |
| YTD return | +53.50% | +11.84% |
| 1-year return | +79.01% | +30.17% |
| 5-year return | +765.82% | +21.51% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 23.83 | 16.71 |
| Forward P/E | 18.91 | 10.95 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.87 | $1.90 |
| Dividend yield | 0.29% | 2.14% |
| Annual dividend | $0.20 | $0.68 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $9.93B | $22.18B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +9.35% | -3.31% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $963.90M | $1.28B |
| Operating margin | 14.46% | 10.19% |
| Net margin | 9.70% | 5.78% |
| 52-week high | $80.70 | $43.59 |
| 52-week low | $35.29 | $21.46 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -15.24% | -27.16% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +11.04% | +36.82% |
| Average volume | 3.05M | 11.10M |
| Shares outstanding | 392.16M | 833.13M |
| Employees | 22,000 | 46,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Energy |
| Industry | Oil and Gas Field Machinery | Oilfield Services/Equipment |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- FTI has outperformed HAL by 48.8 percentage points over the past year.
- TechnipFMC trades at a higher earnings multiple (23.8x vs 16.7x trailing P/E).
- Halliburton offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.14% vs 0.29%).
- TechnipFMC grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+9.35% vs -3.31%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: TechnipFMC in Consumer Discretionary and Halliburton in Energy.
About TechnipFMC
FTI stock →TechnipFMC plc engages in the oil and natural gas projects, technologies, systems, and services businesses in Europe, Central Asia, North America, Latin America, the Asia Pacific, Africa, the Middle East, and internationally. It operates through two segments, Subsea and Surface Technologies.
Consumer Discretionary · Oil and Gas Field Machinery · 22,000 employees
About Halliburton
HAL stock →Halliburton Company provides products and services to the energy industry worldwide. It operates in two segments, Completion and Production, and Drilling and Evaluation.
Energy · Oilfield Services/Equipment · 46,000 employees
FTI vs HAL FAQ
Which is bigger, TechnipFMC or Halliburton?
TechnipFMC (FTI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $26.82B compared with $26.45B for Halliburton (HAL).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FTI or HAL?
FTI returned +79.01% over the past 12 months, compared with +30.17% for HAL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FTI or HAL?
HAL has the lower trailing P/E at 16.7, versus 23.8 for FTI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, TechnipFMC or Halliburton?
Halliburton has the higher yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.29% for TechnipFMC.
Are TechnipFMC and Halliburton in the same industry?
No. TechnipFMC is in the Consumer Discretionary sector, while Halliburton is in Energy.