IES (IESC) vs Jacobs Solutions (J)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
IES (IESC) has outperformed Jacobs Solutions (J) over the past year, gaining 54.1% versus a loss of 12.2%. Over five years, IESC leads with a +1203.1% price change compared with +23.0% for J. Jacobs Solutions is the larger company by market cap ($15.96 billion vs $12.31 billion), about 1.3 times the size, while IES is growing revenue faster (+16.9% vs +4.6%).
On valuation, IES trades at a lower trailing P/E (27.5x vs 45.3x for Jacobs Solutions). Jacobs Solutions pays a dividend yielding 1.00%, while IES does not currently pay one. IES converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 9.1% versus 2.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | IESC | J |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $308.83 | $136.35 |
| Market cap | $12.31B | $15.96B |
| 1-day change | -9.66% | -2.07% |
| YTD return | +56.73% | +2.91% |
| 1-year return | +54.10% | -12.23% |
| 5-year return | +1203.10% | +23.03% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 27.45 | 45.30 |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.49 |
| EPS (TTM) | $11.25 | $3.01 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.36 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.37B | $12.03B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +16.89% | +4.60% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $305.98M | $289.34M |
| Gross margin | 25.49% | 24.81% |
| Operating margin | 11.38% | 7.18% |
| Net margin | 9.08% | 2.41% |
| 52-week high | $408.26 | $168.44 |
| 52-week low | $170.07 | $105.68 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -24.35% | -19.05% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +42.47% | +19.16% |
| Average volume | 322.38K | 853.68K |
| Shares outstanding | 39.85M | 117.04M |
| Employees | 10,262 | 47,000 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- IESC has outperformed J by 66.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Jacobs Solutions trades at a higher earnings multiple (45.3x vs 27.5x trailing P/E).
- IES is more profitable, keeping 9.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 2.4 cents for Jacobs Solutions.
- IES grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+16.89% vs +4.60%).
About IES
IESC stock →IES Holdings, Inc. designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems and provides infrastructure products and services in the United States.
Industrials · Engineering & Construction · 10,262 employees
About Jacobs Solutions
J stock →Jacobs Solutions Inc. engages in the infrastructure and advanced facilities, and consulting businesses in the United States, Europe, Canada, India, Asia, Australia, New Zealand, the Middle East, and Africa.
Industrials · Engineering & Construction · 47,000 employees
IESC vs J FAQ
Which is bigger, IES or Jacobs Solutions?
Jacobs Solutions (J) is larger, with a market capitalization of $15.96B compared with $12.31B for IES (IESC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, IESC or J?
IESC returned +54.10% over the past 12 months, compared with -12.23% for J (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, IESC or J?
IESC has the lower trailing P/E at 27.5, versus 45.3 for J. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, IES or Jacobs Solutions?
Jacobs Solutions pays a dividend yielding 1.00%, while IES does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are IES and Jacobs Solutions in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector.