IHS (IHS) vs Newmark Group (NMRK)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
IHS (IHS) has outperformed Newmark Group (NMRK) over the past year, gaining 25.2% versus a loss of 29.4%. Over five years, NMRK leads with a -17.4% price change compared with -49.4% for IHS. Newmark Group is the larger company by market cap ($2.98 billion vs $2.86 billion), about 1.0 times the size.
On valuation, Newmark Group trades at a lower forward P/E (5.5x vs 15.3x for IHS). Newmark Group pays a dividend yielding 1.23%, while IHS does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | IHS | NMRK |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $8.44 | $12.20 |
| Market cap | $2.86B | $2.98B |
| 1-day change | 0.00% | -3.14% |
| YTD return | +13.14% | -29.67% |
| 1-year return | +25.22% | -29.39% |
| 5-year return | -49.43% | -17.38% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 5.38 | 15.44 |
| Forward P/E | 15.35 | 5.53 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.57 | $0.79 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.23% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.15 |
| 52-week high | $8.95 | $19.84 |
| 52-week low | $5.71 | $11.90 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -5.70% | -38.52% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | -5.21% | +61.95% |
| Average volume | 1.10M | 1.62M |
| Shares outstanding | 338.34M | 159.94M |
| Employees | 2,344 | 10,000 |
| Sector | Real Estate | Real Estate |
| Industry | Real Estate Services | Real Estate Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- IHS has outperformed NMRK by 54.6 percentage points over the past year.
- Newmark Group trades at a higher earnings multiple (15.4x vs 5.4x trailing P/E).
- Newmark Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.23% vs 0.00%).
About IHS
IHS stock →IHS Holding Limited, together with its subsidiaries, develops, owns, and operates shared communications infrastructure in Nigeria, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, South Africa, and Zambia. The company offers colocation and lease amendment services, which allows customers to lease space on existing towers alongside current tenants, install additional equipment on a tower, and request for ancillary services; build-to-suit sites; in-building solutions and distributed antenna systems, which allows customers to lease space in secure locations within large building complexes, such as shopping malls, stadiums, and airports; non-intrusive small cell installation services on commercial premises, lampposts, and poles; fiber-to-the-tower connectivity services; rural telephony services; and managed services, including maintenance, security, and power supply services.
Real Estate · Real Estate Services · 2,344 employees
About Newmark Group
NMRK stock →Newmark Group, Inc. operates as a commercial real estate advisor and service provider in the United States, the United Kingdom, Asia, rest of Europe, and other Americas.
Real Estate · Real Estate Services · 10,000 employees
IHS vs NMRK FAQ
Which is bigger, IHS or Newmark Group?
Newmark Group (NMRK) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.98B compared with $2.86B for IHS (IHS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, IHS or NMRK?
IHS returned +25.22% over the past 12 months, compared with -29.39% for NMRK (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, IHS or NMRK?
IHS has the lower trailing P/E at 5.4, versus 15.4 for NMRK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, IHS or Newmark Group?
Newmark Group pays a dividend yielding 1.23%, while IHS does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are IHS and Newmark Group in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Real Estate Services industry within the Real Estate sector.