Imperial Oil (IMO) vs PBF Energy (PBF)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
PBF Energy (PBF) has outperformed Imperial Oil (IMO) over the past year, gaining 178.9% versus a gain of 31.5%. Over five years, PBF leads with a +433.7% price change compared with +244.5% for IMO. On valuation, PBF Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (4.8x vs 13.6x for Imperial Oil).
Imperial Oil offers the higher dividend yield (2.67% vs 1.31%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | IMO | PBF |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $119.30 | $83.68 |
| Market cap | — | $9.92B |
| 1-day change | -2.37% | +0.97% |
| YTD return | +38.22% | +208.55% |
| 1-year return | +31.46% | +178.93% |
| 5-year return | +244.50% | +433.67% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 19.27 | 7.37 |
| Forward P/E | 13.58 | 4.80 |
| EPS (TTM) | $6.19 | $11.36 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 1.31% |
| Annual dividend | $3.18 | $1.10 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $29.33B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | -11.42% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $-158.50M |
| Gross margin | — | -1.95% |
| Operating margin | — | -0.19% |
| Net margin | — | -0.54% |
| 52-week high | $139.44 | $85.75 |
| 52-week low | $83.27 | $25.62 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -14.44% | -2.41% |
| Analyst consensus | underperform | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | -10.65% | -7.98% |
| Average volume | 549.70K | 3.36M |
| Shares outstanding | — | 118.54M |
| Employees | 5,000 | 3,678 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Integrated oil Companies | Integrated oil Companies |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PBF has outperformed IMO by 147.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Imperial Oil trades at a higher earnings multiple (19.3x vs 7.4x trailing P/E).
- Imperial Oil offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.67% vs 1.31%).
About Imperial Oil
IMO stock →Imperial Oil Limited engages in exploration, production, and sale of crude oil and natural gas in Canada. The company operates in three segments: Upstream, Downstream and Chemical segments.
Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 5,000 employees
About PBF Energy
PBF stock →PBF Energy Inc., through its subsidiaries, engages in the refining and supplying of petroleum products. It operates through two segments, Refining and Logistics.
Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 3,678 employees
IMO vs PBF FAQ
Which stock has performed better over the past year, IMO or PBF?
PBF returned +178.93% over the past 12 months, compared with +31.46% for IMO (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, IMO or PBF?
PBF has the lower trailing P/E at 7.4, versus 19.3 for IMO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Imperial Oil or PBF Energy?
Imperial Oil has the higher yield at 2.67%, compared with 1.31% for PBF Energy.
Are Imperial Oil and PBF Energy in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Integrated oil Companies industry within the Energy sector.