Interparfums (IPAR) vs Kimberly-Clark (KMB)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Interparfums (IPAR) has outperformed Kimberly-Clark (KMB) over the past year, gaining 18.3% versus a loss of 21.1%. Over five years, IPAR leads with a +39.8% price change compared with -27.6% for KMB. Kimberly-Clark is the larger company by market cap ($32.09 billion vs $3.55 billion), about 9.0 times the size.
On valuation, Kimberly-Clark trades at a lower forward P/E (12.9x vs 21.3x for Interparfums). Kimberly-Clark offers the higher dividend yield (5.27% vs 2.88%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | IPAR | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $111.00 | $96.48 |
| Market cap | $3.55B | $32.09B |
| 1-day change | -1.64% | -0.30% |
| YTD return | +30.85% | -4.37% |
| 1-year return | +18.32% | -21.13% |
| 5-year return | +39.82% | -27.64% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 21.18 | 19.03 |
| Forward P/E | 21.33 | 12.92 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.24 | $5.07 |
| Dividend yield | 2.88% | 5.27% |
| Annual dividend | $3.20 | $5.08 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $16.45B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | -2.13% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $2.02B |
| Gross margin | — | 36.01% |
| Operating margin | — | 14.29% |
| Net margin | — | 12.29% |
| 52-week high | $129.29 | $123.09 |
| 52-week low | $77.21 | $92.42 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -14.15% | -21.62% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +13.96% | +20.10% |
| Average volume | 250.64K | 3.90M |
| Shares outstanding | 32.03M | 332.58M |
| Employees | 662 | 36,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Package Goods/Cosmetics | Containers/Packaging |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Kimberly-Clark is about 9.0 times larger than Interparfums by market value ($32.09B vs $3.55B).
- IPAR has outperformed KMB by 39.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Kimberly-Clark offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.27% vs 2.88%).
About Interparfums
IPAR stock →Interparfums, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, manufactures, markets, and distributes a range of fragrances and fragrance related products in the United States and internationally. It operates in two segments, European Based Operations and United States Based Operations.
Consumer Discretionary · Package Goods/Cosmetics · 662 employees
About Kimberly-Clark
KMB stock →Kimberly-Clark Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and markets personal care products in the United States. It operates in two segments, North America and International Personal Care.
Consumer Discretionary · Containers/Packaging · 36,000 employees
IPAR vs KMB FAQ
Which is bigger, Interparfums or Kimberly-Clark?
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) is larger, with a market capitalization of $32.09B compared with $3.55B for Interparfums (IPAR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, IPAR or KMB?
IPAR returned +18.32% over the past 12 months, compared with -21.13% for KMB (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, IPAR or KMB?
KMB has the lower trailing P/E at 19.0, versus 21.2 for IPAR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Interparfums or Kimberly-Clark?
Kimberly-Clark has the higher yield at 5.27%, compared with 2.88% for Interparfums.
Are Interparfums and Kimberly-Clark in the same industry?
Both are in the Consumer Discretionary sector, but in different industries: Package Goods/Cosmetics for Interparfums and Containers/Packaging for Kimberly-Clark.