MetaCap

Ormat Technologies (ORA) vs TXNM Energy (TXNM)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

TXNM Energy (TXNM) has outperformed Ormat Technologies (ORA) over the past year, gaining 3.0% versus a loss of 14.1%. Over five years, ORA leads with a +26.1% price change compared with +17.9% for TXNM. TXNM Energy is the larger company by market cap ($6.44 billion vs $5.53 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Ormat Technologies is growing revenue faster (+12.5% vs +9.9%).

On valuation, TXNM Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (18.0x vs 35.3x for Ormat Technologies). TXNM Energy offers the higher dividend yield (2.86% vs 0.53%). Ormat Technologies converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 12.5% versus 7.8%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ORA-14.10%TXNM+3.01%
+41%+12%-17%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ORA+28.18%TXNM+17.99%
+106%+36%-35%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ORA versus TXNM key metrics
MetricORATXNM
Share price$89.97$58.51
Market cap$5.53B$6.44B
1-day change-3.33%-0.07%
YTD return-18.49%-0.63%
1-year return-14.10%+3.01%
5-year return+26.13%+17.92%
P/E ratio (TTM)44.1033.63
Forward P/E35.2618.00
EPS (TTM)$2.04$1.74
Dividend yield0.53%2.86%
Annual dividend$0.48$1.68
Revenue (latest FY)$989.54M$2.17B
Revenue growth (YoY)+12.49%+9.86%
Net income (latest FY)$123.90M$169.83M
Gross margin27.56%—
Operating margin17.10%20.37%
Net margin12.52%7.84%
52-week high$146.39$59.53
52-week low$87.06$55.64
Distance from 52-week high-38.54%-1.71%
Analyst consensusbuynone
Avg. price target upside+41.90%+3.74%
Average volume852.07K1.26M
Shares outstanding61.50M110.13M
Employees1,6481,755
SectorUtilitiesUtilities
IndustryElectric Utilities: CentralElectric Utilities: Central

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • TXNM has outperformed ORA by 17.1 percentage points over the past year.
  • Ormat Technologies trades at a higher earnings multiple (44.1x vs 33.6x trailing P/E).
  • TXNM Energy offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.86% vs 0.53%).

About Ormat Technologies

ORA stock →

Ormat Technologies, Inc. engages in the geothermal and recovered energy power business in the United States, Indonesia, Kenya, Turkey, Chile, Guatemala, Guadeloupe, New Zealand, Honduras, France, Indonesia, the Philippines, and internationally.

Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central · 1,648 employees

About TXNM Energy

TXNM stock →

TXNM Energy, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides electricity and electric services in the United States. The company engages in the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity for retail electric customers; and owns and leases communications, office and other equipment, office space, vehicles, energy storage facilities, and real estate.

Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central · 1,755 employees

ORA vs TXNM FAQ

Which is bigger, Ormat Technologies or TXNM Energy?

TXNM Energy (TXNM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.44B compared with $5.53B for Ormat Technologies (ORA).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ORA or TXNM?

TXNM returned +3.01% over the past 12 months, compared with -14.10% for ORA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ORA or TXNM?

TXNM has the lower trailing P/E at 33.6, versus 44.1 for ORA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Ormat Technologies or TXNM Energy?

TXNM Energy has the higher yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.53% for Ormat Technologies.

Are Ormat Technologies and TXNM Energy in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Electric Utilities: Central industry within the Utilities sector.

More comparisons