PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund (PCQ) vs RENN Fund (RCG)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
On valuation, RENN Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (5.1x vs 7.0x for PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund). PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund offers the higher dividend yield (5.61% vs 0.74%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Head-to-head
| Metric | PCQ | RCG |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $7.70 | $2.85 |
| 1-day change | -0.77% | -3.34% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 7.00 | 5.09 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.10 | $0.56 |
| Dividend yield | 5.61% | 0.74% |
| Annual dividend | $0.432 | $0.021 |
| 52-week high | $9.19 | $3.31 |
| 52-week low | $7.57 | $2.45 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -16.21% | -13.90% |
| Average volume | 180.17K | 6.01K |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (7.0x vs 5.1x trailing P/E).
- PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.61% vs 0.74%).
PCQ vs RCG FAQ
Which has the lower P/E ratio, PCQ or RCG?
RCG has the lower trailing P/E at 5.1, versus 7.0 for PCQ. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund or RENN Fund?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has the higher yield at 5.61%, compared with 0.74% for RENN Fund.
Are PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund and RENN Fund in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.