Acadian Asset Management (AAMI) vs Federated Hermes (FHI)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Acadian Asset Management (AAMI) has outperformed Federated Hermes (FHI) over the past year, gaining 111.2% versus a gain of 6.8%. Over five years, AAMI leads with a +248.7% price change compared with +69.4% for FHI. Federated Hermes is the larger company by market cap ($4.21 billion vs $3.35 billion), about 1.3 times the size, while Acadian Asset Management is growing revenue faster (+11.5% vs +10.3%).
On valuation, Federated Hermes trades at a lower forward P/E (9.7x vs 14.6x for Acadian Asset Management). Federated Hermes offers the higher dividend yield (2.48% vs 0.33%). Federated Hermes converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 22.4% versus 14.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AAMI | FHI |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $94.37 | $56.44 |
| Market cap | $3.35B | $4.21B |
| 1-day change | +1.14% | +0.88% |
| YTD return | +98.51% | +7.45% |
| 1-year return | +111.23% | +6.80% |
| 5-year return | +248.65% | +69.44% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 33.46 | 10.51 |
| Forward P/E | 14.60 | 9.68 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.82 | $5.37 |
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | 2.48% |
| Annual dividend | $0.31 | $1.40 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $563.70M | $1.80B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +11.49% | +10.33% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $80.00M | $403.30M |
| Operating margin | 23.43% | 28.54% |
| Net margin | 14.19% | 22.40% |
| 52-week high | $98.52 | $67.20 |
| 52-week low | $41.47 | $46.66 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -4.22% | -16.01% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | -3.57% | +6.56% |
| Average volume | 424.77K | 604.39K |
| Shares outstanding | 35.49M | 74.65M |
| Employees | 396 | 2,091 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- AAMI has outperformed FHI by 104.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Acadian Asset Management trades at a higher earnings multiple (33.5x vs 10.5x trailing P/E).
- Federated Hermes offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.48% vs 0.33%).
- Federated Hermes is more profitable, keeping 22.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 14.2 cents for Acadian Asset Management.
About Acadian Asset Management
AAMI stock →Acadian Asset Management Inc. is a publicly owned asset management holding company.
Finance · Investment Managers · 396 employees
About Federated Hermes
FHI stock →Federated Hermes, Inc. is a publicly owned investment manager.
Finance · Investment Managers · 2,091 employees
AAMI vs FHI FAQ
Which is bigger, Acadian Asset Management or Federated Hermes?
Federated Hermes (FHI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.21B compared with $3.35B for Acadian Asset Management (AAMI).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AAMI or FHI?
AAMI returned +111.23% over the past 12 months, compared with +6.80% for FHI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AAMI or FHI?
FHI has the lower trailing P/E at 10.5, versus 33.5 for AAMI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Acadian Asset Management or Federated Hermes?
Federated Hermes has the higher yield at 2.48%, compared with 0.33% for Acadian Asset Management.
Are Acadian Asset Management and Federated Hermes in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.