MetaCap

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) vs Merck (MRK)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Merck (MRK) has outperformed Abbott Laboratories (ABT) over the past year, gaining 63.0% versus a loss of 25.8%. Over five years, MRK leads with a +82.3% price change compared with -16.0% for ABT. Merck is the larger company by market cap ($352.29 billion vs $170.84 billion), about 2.1 times the size, while Abbott Laboratories is growing revenue faster (+5.7% vs +1.3%).

On valuation, Merck trades at a lower forward P/E (15.1x vs 16.3x for Abbott Laboratories). Abbott Laboratories offers the higher dividend yield (2.51% vs 2.33%). Merck converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 28.1% versus 14.7%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ABT-25.78%MRK+62.98%
+84%+20%-44%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ABT-16.61%MRK+77.09%
+95%+30%-35%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ABT versus MRK key metrics
MetricABTMRK
Share price$98.73$142.79
Market cap$170.84B$352.29B
1-day change+0.58%+0.60%
YTD return-21.20%+35.65%
1-year return-25.78%+62.98%
5-year return-15.97%+82.29%
P/E ratio (TTM)31.85113.33
Forward P/E16.2815.08
EPS (TTM)$3.10$1.26
Dividend yield2.51%2.33%
Annual dividend$2.48$3.32
Revenue (latest FY)$44.33B$65.01B
Revenue growth (YoY)+5.67%+1.31%
Net income (latest FY)$6.52B$18.25B
Gross margin56.42%74.80%
Operating margin18.17%—
Net margin14.72%28.08%
52-week high$135.13$156.92
52-week low$81.97$82.01
Distance from 52-week high-26.94%-9.00%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+22.27%+9.45%
Average volume9.56M9.77M
Shares outstanding1.73B2.47B
Employees122,00073,000
SectorHealth CareHealth Care
IndustryBiotechnology: Pharmaceutical PreparationsBiotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Merck is about 2.1 times larger than Abbott Laboratories by market value ($352.29B vs $170.84B).
  • MRK has outperformed ABT by 88.8 percentage points over the past year.
  • Merck trades at a higher earnings multiple (113.3x vs 31.8x trailing P/E).
  • Merck is more profitable, keeping 28.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 14.7 cents for Abbott Laboratories.

About Abbott Laboratories

ABT stock →

Abbott Laboratories, together with its subsidiaries, discovers, develops, manufactures, and sells health care products worldwide. It operates in four segments: Established Pharmaceutical Products, Diagnostic Products, Nutritional Products, and Medical Devices.

Health Care · Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations · 122,000 employees

About Merck

MRK stock →

Merck & Co., Inc. operates as a healthcare company worldwide.

Health Care · Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations · 73,000 employees

ABT vs MRK FAQ

Which is bigger, Abbott Laboratories or Merck?

Merck (MRK) is larger, with a market capitalization of $352.29B compared with $170.84B for Abbott Laboratories (ABT).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ABT or MRK?

MRK returned +62.98% over the past 12 months, compared with -25.78% for ABT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ABT or MRK?

ABT has the lower trailing P/E at 31.8, versus 113.3 for MRK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Abbott Laboratories or Merck?

Abbott Laboratories has the higher yield at 2.51%, compared with 2.33% for Merck.

Are Abbott Laboratories and Merck in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations industry within the Health Care sector.

More comparisons