MetaCap

Arbutus Biopharma (ABUS) vs Gyre Therapeutics (GYRE)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 18, 2026.

Summary

Arbutus Biopharma (ABUS) has outperformed Gyre Therapeutics (GYRE) over the past year, losing 4.3% versus a loss of 26.7%. Over five years, ABUS leads with a +4.7% price change compared with -88.3% for GYRE. Arbutus Biopharma is the larger company by market cap ($646.8 million vs $644.7 million), about 1.0 times the size.

Gyre Therapeutics converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.5% versus -237.9%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ABUS-4.31%GYRE-26.75%
+21%-7%-36%
Oct 17, 20251 yearOct 16, 2026
ABUS+3.43%GYRE-89.87%
+34%-34%-101%
Oct 11, 20215 yearsOct 12, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ABUS versus GYRE key metrics
MetricABUSGYRE
Share price$4.22$6.08
Market cap$646.82M$644.69M
1-day change-1.63%-5.00%
YTD return-12.27%-13.88%
1-year return-4.31%-26.75%
5-year return+4.71%-88.32%
P/E ratio (TTM)5.34—
Forward P/E—101.33
EPS (TTM)$0.79$-0.25
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$14.08M$116.59M
Revenue growth (YoY)+128.21%+10.24%
Net income (latest FY)$-33.50M$9.88M
Gross margin—95.35%
Operating margin-270.96%9.85%
Net margin-237.88%8.47%
52-week high$5.45$9.14
52-week low$3.50$5.44
Distance from 52-week high-22.57%-33.48%
Analyst consensusnonenone
Avg. price target upside+27.96%+207.07%
Average volume4.81M110.57K
Shares outstanding153.28M106.03M
Employees19625
SectorHealth CareHealth Care
IndustryBiotechnology: Pharmaceutical PreparationsBiotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • ABUS has outperformed GYRE by 22.4 percentage points over the past year.
  • Gyre Therapeutics is more profitable, keeping 8.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -237.9 cents for Arbutus Biopharma.
  • Arbutus Biopharma grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+128.21% vs +10.24%).

About Arbutus Biopharma

ABUS stock →

Arbutus Biopharma Corporation, a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, develops novel therapeutics for infectious disease in the United States. Its chronic Hepatitis B virus product pipeline comprises Imdusiran, conjugated GalNAc, subcutaneously-delivered RNAi therapeutic product candidate which is in phase 2a clinical trials that suppresses all HBV antigens, including HBsAg expression; and AB-101, an oral PD-L1 inhibitor, which is in phase 1a/1b clinical trial that has the potential to reawaken patients' HBV-specific immune response by inhibiting PD-L1.

Health Care · Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations · 19 employees

About Gyre Therapeutics

GYRE stock →

Gyre Therapeutics, Inc., a pharmaceutical company, engages in the development and commercialization of small-molecule, anti-inflammatory, and anti-fibrotic drugs targeting organ fibrosis. The company offers ETUARY (Pirfenidone), an anti-fibrotic drug approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; and under Phase 3 trials for the treatment of pneumoconiosis.

Health Care · Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations · 625 employees

ABUS vs GYRE FAQ

Which is bigger, Arbutus Biopharma or Gyre Therapeutics?

Arbutus Biopharma (ABUS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $646.82M compared with $644.69M for Gyre Therapeutics (GYRE).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ABUS or GYRE?

ABUS returned -4.31% over the past 12 months, compared with -26.75% for GYRE (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Are Arbutus Biopharma and Gyre Therapeutics in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations industry within the Health Care sector.

More comparisons