Arcosa (ACA) vs Constellium (CSTM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Constellium (CSTM) has outperformed Arcosa (ACA) over the past year, gaining 65.3% versus a gain of 61.1%. Over five years, ACA leads with a +181.4% price change compared with +32.8% for CSTM. Arcosa is the larger company by market cap ($7.19 billion vs $3.45 billion), about 2.1 times the size, while Constellium is growing revenue faster (+15.2% vs +12.2%).
On valuation, Constellium trades at a lower forward P/E (8.6x vs 28.6x for Arcosa). Arcosa pays a dividend yielding 0.14%, while Constellium does not currently pay one. Arcosa converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 7.2% versus 3.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ACA | CSTM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $146.40 | $25.42 |
| Market cap | $7.19B | $3.45B |
| 1-day change | -0.07% | -0.31% |
| YTD return | +37.70% | +34.85% |
| 1-year return | +61.13% | +65.28% |
| 5-year return | +181.43% | +32.81% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 36.15 | 6.57 |
| Forward P/E | 28.60 | 8.63 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.05 | $3.87 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.20 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.88B | $8.45B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +12.20% | +15.19% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $208.40M | $273.00M |
| Gross margin | 22.45% | 14.05% |
| Operating margin | 11.86% | — |
| Net margin | 7.23% | 3.23% |
| 52-week high | $147.05 | $36.99 |
| 52-week low | $89.03 | $14.39 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -0.44% | -31.28% |
| Analyst consensus | none | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +0.18% | +39.02% |
| Average volume | 675.84K | 1.58M |
| Shares outstanding | 49.11M | 135.53M |
| Employees | 6,390 | 11,500 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Metal Fabrications | Metal Fabrications |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Arcosa is about 2.1 times larger than Constellium by market value ($7.19B vs $3.45B).
- Arcosa trades at a higher earnings multiple (36.1x vs 6.6x trailing P/E).
About Arcosa
ACA stock →Arcosa, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides infrastructure-related products and solutions for the construction, engineered structures, and transportation markets in the United States. The company operates through three segments: Construction Products, Engineered Structures, and Transportation Products.
Industrials · Metal Fabrications · 6,390 employees
About Constellium
CSTM stock →Constellium SE, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the design, manufacture, and sale of rolled and extruded aluminum products for the aerospace, packaging, automotive, commercial transportation, general industrial, and defense end-markets. It operates through three segments: Packaging & Automotive Rolled Products, Aerospace & Transportation, and Automotive Structures & Industry.
Industrials · Metal Fabrications · 11,500 employees
ACA vs CSTM FAQ
Which is bigger, Arcosa or Constellium?
Arcosa (ACA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $7.19B compared with $3.45B for Constellium (CSTM).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ACA or CSTM?
CSTM returned +65.28% over the past 12 months, compared with +61.13% for ACA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ACA or CSTM?
CSTM has the lower trailing P/E at 6.6, versus 36.1 for ACA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Arcosa or Constellium?
Arcosa pays a dividend yielding 0.14%, while Constellium does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Arcosa and Constellium in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Metal Fabrications industry within the Industrials sector.