MetaCap

Arcosa (ACA) vs Dycom Industries (DY)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Arcosa (ACA) has outperformed Dycom Industries (DY) over the past year, gaining 61.1% versus a loss of 2.4%. Over five years, DY leads with a +297.6% price change compared with +181.4% for ACA. Dycom Industries is the larger company by market cap ($8.52 billion vs $7.19 billion), about 1.2 times the size.

On valuation, Dycom Industries trades at a lower forward P/E (13.6x vs 28.6x for Arcosa). Arcosa pays a dividend yielding 0.14%, while Dycom Industries does not currently pay one. Arcosa converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 7.2% versus 5.1%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ACA+61.13%DY-2.43%
+92%+40%-12%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ACA+182.57%DY+298.79%
+660%+307%-47%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ACA versus DY key metrics
MetricACADY
Share price$146.40$282.46
Market cap$7.19B$8.52B
1-day change-0.07%-2.74%
YTD return+37.70%-17.33%
1-year return+61.13%-2.43%
5-year return+181.43%+297.59%
P/E ratio (TTM)36.1525.80
Forward P/E28.6013.59
EPS (TTM)$4.05$10.95
Dividend yield0.14%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.20$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$2.88B$5.55B
Revenue growth (YoY)+12.20%+17.95%
Net income (latest FY)$208.40M$281.19M
Gross margin22.45%20.56%
Operating margin11.86%—
Net margin7.23%5.07%
52-week high$147.05$566.47
52-week low$89.03$263.36
Distance from 52-week high-0.44%-50.14%
Analyst consensusnonestrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+0.18%+84.42%
Average volume675.99K580.30K
Shares outstanding49.11M30.16M
Employees6,39019,556
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryMetal FabricationsWater Sewer Pipeline Comm & Power Line Construction

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • ACA has outperformed DY by 63.6 percentage points over the past year.
  • Arcosa trades at a higher earnings multiple (36.1x vs 25.8x trailing P/E).
  • Dycom Industries grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+17.95% vs +12.20%).

About Arcosa

ACA stock →

Arcosa, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides infrastructure-related products and solutions for the construction, engineered structures, and transportation markets in the United States. The company operates through three segments: Construction Products, Engineered Structures, and Transportation Products.

Industrials · Metal Fabrications · 6,390 employees

About Dycom Industries

DY stock →

Dycom Industries, Inc. provides specialty contracting services to the digital infrastructure, telecommunications infrastructure, and utility industries in the United States.

Industrials · Water Sewer Pipeline Comm & Power Line Construction · 19,556 employees

ACA vs DY FAQ

Which is bigger, Arcosa or Dycom Industries?

Dycom Industries (DY) is larger, with a market capitalization of $8.52B compared with $7.19B for Arcosa (ACA).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ACA or DY?

ACA returned +61.13% over the past 12 months, compared with -2.43% for DY (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ACA or DY?

DY has the lower trailing P/E at 25.8, versus 36.1 for ACA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Arcosa or Dycom Industries?

Arcosa pays a dividend yielding 0.14%, while Dycom Industries does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Arcosa and Dycom Industries in the same industry?

Both are in the Industrials sector, but in different industries: Metal Fabrications for Arcosa and Water Sewer Pipeline Comm & Power Line Construction for Dycom Industries.

More comparisons