Arcosa (ACA) vs Tetra Tech (TTEK)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Arcosa (ACA) has outperformed Tetra Tech (TTEK) over the past year, gaining 61.1% versus a loss of 4.5%. Over five years, ACA leads with a +181.4% price change compared with +0.9% for TTEK. Tetra Tech is the larger company by market cap ($8.38 billion vs $7.19 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Arcosa is growing revenue faster (+12.2% vs +4.7%).
On valuation, Tetra Tech trades at a lower forward P/E (18.8x vs 28.6x for Arcosa). Tetra Tech offers the higher dividend yield (0.82% vs 0.14%). Arcosa converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 7.2% versus 4.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ACA | TTEK |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $146.40 | $32.72 |
| Market cap | $7.19B | $8.38B |
| 1-day change | -0.07% | -1.98% |
| YTD return | +37.70% | -2.44% |
| 1-year return | +61.13% | -4.47% |
| 5-year return | +181.43% | +0.94% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 36.15 | 19.71 |
| Forward P/E | 28.60 | 18.83 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.05 | $1.66 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 0.82% |
| Annual dividend | $0.20 | $0.267 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.88B | $5.44B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +12.20% | +4.69% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $208.40M | $247.95M |
| Gross margin | 22.45% | 17.66% |
| Operating margin | 11.86% | 7.50% |
| Net margin | 7.23% | 4.56% |
| 52-week high | $147.05 | $43.14 |
| 52-week low | $89.03 | $25.81 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -0.44% | -24.15% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +0.18% | +23.26% |
| Average volume | 674.18K | 2.52M |
| Shares outstanding | 49.11M | 256.04M |
| Employees | 6,390 | 25,000 |
| Sector | Industrials | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Metal Fabrications | Military/Government/Technical |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ACA has outperformed TTEK by 65.6 percentage points over the past year.
- Arcosa trades at a higher earnings multiple (36.1x vs 19.7x trailing P/E).
- Arcosa grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+12.20% vs +4.69%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Arcosa in Industrials and Tetra Tech in Consumer Discretionary.
About Arcosa
ACA stock →Arcosa, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides infrastructure-related products and solutions for the construction, engineered structures, and transportation markets in the United States. The company operates through three segments: Construction Products, Engineered Structures, and Transportation Products.
Industrials · Metal Fabrications · 6,390 employees
About Tetra Tech
TTEK stock →Tetra Tech, Inc. provides consulting and engineering services focusing on water, environment, and sustainable infrastructure in the United States and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Military/Government/Technical · 25,000 employees
ACA vs TTEK FAQ
Which is bigger, Arcosa or Tetra Tech?
Tetra Tech (TTEK) is larger, with a market capitalization of $8.38B compared with $7.19B for Arcosa (ACA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ACA or TTEK?
ACA returned +61.13% over the past 12 months, compared with -4.47% for TTEK (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ACA or TTEK?
TTEK has the lower trailing P/E at 19.7, versus 36.1 for ACA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Arcosa or Tetra Tech?
Tetra Tech has the higher yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.14% for Arcosa.
Are Arcosa and Tetra Tech in the same industry?
No. Arcosa is in the Industrials sector, while Tetra Tech is in Consumer Discretionary.