AECOM (ACM) vs Fluor (FLR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Fluor (FLR) has outperformed AECOM (ACM) over the past year, gaining 19.2% versus a loss of 55.0%. Over five years, FLR leads with a +193.6% price change compared with -8.2% for ACM. AECOM is the larger company by market cap ($7.64 billion vs $6.76 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
On valuation, AECOM trades at a lower forward P/E (9.3x vs 15.0x for Fluor). AECOM pays a dividend yielding 2.01%, while Fluor does not currently pay one. AECOM converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 3.5% versus -0.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ACM | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $59.35 | $50.53 |
| Market cap | $7.64B | $6.76B |
| 1-day change | +1.84% | -1.20% |
| YTD return | -38.86% | +29.04% |
| 1-year return | -54.97% | +19.15% |
| 5-year return | -8.22% | +193.57% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 20.90 | — |
| Forward P/E | 9.31 | 15.01 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.84 | $-11.90 |
| Dividend yield | 2.01% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $1.19 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $16.14B | $15.50B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +0.21% | -4.98% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $561.77M | $-51.00M |
| Gross margin | 7.54% | -0.77% |
| Operating margin | 6.36% | -2.44% |
| Net margin | 3.48% | -0.33% |
| 52-week high | $135.52 | $58.35 |
| 52-week low | $56.39 | $39.33 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -56.21% | -13.41% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +45.04% | +22.10% |
| Average volume | 1.93M | 2.41M |
| Shares outstanding | 128.70M | 133.74M |
| Employees | 51,000 | 22,995 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Industrials |
| Industry | Military/Government/Technical | Military/Government/Technical |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- FLR has outperformed ACM by 74.1 percentage points over the past year.
- AECOM offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.01% vs 0.00%).
- AECOM grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+0.21% vs -4.98%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: AECOM in Consumer Discretionary and Fluor in Industrials.
About AECOM
ACM stock →AECOM, together with its subsidiaries, provides professional infrastructure consulting services for governments, businesses, and organizations internationally. The company operates in three segments: Americas, International, and AECOM Capital.
Consumer Discretionary · Military/Government/Technical · 51,000 employees
About Fluor
FLR stock →Fluor Corporation provides engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC); fabrication and modularization; and project management services worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Urban Solutions, Energy Solutions, and Mission Solutions.
Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 22,995 employees
ACM vs FLR FAQ
Which is bigger, AECOM or Fluor?
AECOM (ACM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $7.64B compared with $6.76B for Fluor (FLR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ACM or FLR?
FLR returned +19.15% over the past 12 months, compared with -54.97% for ACM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, AECOM or Fluor?
AECOM pays a dividend yielding 2.01%, while Fluor does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are AECOM and Fluor in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Military/Government/Technical industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.