MetaCap

Aebi Schmidt (AEBI) vs Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock (OSK)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock (OSK) has outperformed Aebi Schmidt (AEBI) over the past year, losing 1.4% versus a loss of 9.7%. Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock is the larger company by market cap ($7.94 billion vs $849.8 million), about 9.3 times the size. On valuation, Aebi Schmidt trades at a lower forward P/E (9.2x vs 9.2x for Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock).

Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock offers the higher dividend yield (1.68% vs 0.91%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

AEBI-9.65%OSK-1.42%
+39%+6%-27%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
AEBI-19.54%OSK+3.54%
+45%+5%-34%
Jun 30, 20255 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

AEBI versus OSK key metrics
MetricAEBIOSK
Share price$10.95$128.61
Market cap$849.76M$7.94B
1-day change-3.27%-2.66%
YTD return-13.44%+2.37%
1-year return-9.65%-1.42%
5-year return—+26.51%
P/E ratio (TTM)36.5015.13
Forward P/E9.169.21
EPS (TTM)$0.30$8.50
Dividend yield0.91%1.68%
Annual dividend$0.10$2.16
Revenue (latest FY)—$10.42B
Revenue growth (YoY)—-2.87%
Net income (latest FY)—$647.00M
Gross margin—17.45%
Operating margin—9.01%
Net margin—6.21%
52-week high$15.96$180.49
52-week low$8.91$116.77
Distance from 52-week high-31.39%-28.74%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+55.25%+30.22%
Average volume378.54K714.51K
Shares outstanding77.60M61.74M
Employees5,41518,000
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryFarm & Heavy Construction MachineryAuto Manufacturing

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock is about 9.3 times larger than Aebi Schmidt by market value ($7.94B vs $849.76M).
  • Aebi Schmidt trades at a higher earnings multiple (36.5x vs 15.1x trailing P/E).

About Aebi Schmidt

AEBI stock →

Aebi Schmidt Holding AG manufactures specialty vehicles in North America, Europe, and internationally. It offers a portfolio of single axle implement carriers and transporters for the agriculture and municipal sectors; maintenance equipment, such as plows, snow cutters, spreaders, sprayers, and sweeping machines; and custom engineering, installation, manufacturing, and distribution of performance-driven municipal, commercial, and fleet vehicles.

Industrials · Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery · 5,415 employees

About Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock

OSK stock →

Oshkosh Corporation provides purpose-built vehicles and equipment worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Access, Vocational, and Transport segment.

Industrials · Auto Manufacturing · 18,000 employees

AEBI vs OSK FAQ

Which is bigger, Aebi Schmidt or Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock?

Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock (OSK) is larger, with a market capitalization of $7.94B compared with $849.76M for Aebi Schmidt (AEBI).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, AEBI or OSK?

OSK returned -1.42% over the past 12 months, compared with -9.65% for AEBI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, AEBI or OSK?

OSK has the lower trailing P/E at 15.1, versus 36.5 for AEBI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Aebi Schmidt or Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock?

Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock has the higher yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.91% for Aebi Schmidt.

Are Aebi Schmidt and Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock in the same industry?

Both are in the Industrials sector, but in different industries: Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery for Aebi Schmidt and Auto Manufacturing for Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock.

More comparisons