abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (AEF) vs Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term (FINS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (AEF) has outperformed Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term (FINS) over the past year, gaining 41.6% versus a loss of 9.9%. Over five years, AEF leads with a +9.6% price change compared with -29.6% for FINS. Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term is the larger company by market cap ($397.3 million vs $376.0 million), about 1.1 times the size.
On valuation, abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (2.0x vs 8.5x for Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term). Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term offers the higher dividend yield (11.30% vs 8.53%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AEF | FINS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $9.26 | $11.89 |
| Market cap | $375.97M | $397.33M |
| 1-day change | -2.22% | +0.08% |
| YTD return | +32.29% | -9.99% |
| 1-year return | +41.59% | -9.86% |
| 5-year return | +9.59% | -29.56% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 1.95 | 8.49 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.74 | $1.40 |
| Dividend yield | 8.53% | 11.30% |
| Annual dividend | $0.79 | $1.34 |
| 52-week high | $10.14 | $13.45 |
| 52-week low | $6.26 | $11.83 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -8.68% | -11.60% |
| Average volume | 98.43K | 44.70K |
| Shares outstanding | 40.60M | 33.42M |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance/Investors Services | Finance/Investors Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- AEF has outperformed FINS by 51.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term trades at a higher earnings multiple (8.5x vs 2.0x trailing P/E).
- Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (11.30% vs 8.53%).
About abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
AEF stock →abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund, Inc. is a closed ended equity mutual fund and managed by Aberdeen Asset Managers Limited.
Finance · Finance/Investors Services
AEF vs FINS FAQ
Which is bigger, abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund or Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term?
Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term (FINS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $397.33M compared with $375.97M for abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (AEF).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AEF or FINS?
AEF returned +41.59% over the past 12 months, compared with -9.86% for FINS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AEF or FINS?
AEF has the lower trailing P/E at 2.0, versus 8.5 for FINS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund or Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term?
Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term has the higher yield at 11.30%, compared with 8.53% for abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund.
Are abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund and Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Finance/Investors Services industry within the Finance sector.