AGCO (AGCO) vs Leonardo DRS (DRS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
AGCO (AGCO) has outperformed Leonardo DRS (DRS) over the past year, losing 0.9% versus a loss of 21.0%. Over five years, DRS leads with a +249.3% price change compared with -15.7% for AGCO. Leonardo DRS is the larger company by market cap ($9.57 billion vs $7.57 billion), about 1.3 times the size.
On valuation, AGCO trades at a lower forward P/E (14.5x vs 24.4x for Leonardo DRS). AGCO offers the higher dividend yield (1.08% vs 1.00%). Leonardo DRS converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 7.6% versus 7.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AGCO | DRS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $108.13 | $35.87 |
| Market cap | $7.57B | $9.57B |
| 1-day change | -0.93% | +0.25% |
| YTD return | +3.65% | +5.22% |
| 1-year return | -0.89% | -21.04% |
| 5-year return | -15.73% | +249.27% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 14.96 | 30.14 |
| Forward P/E | 14.49 | 24.45 |
| EPS (TTM) | $7.23 | $1.19 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 1.00% |
| Annual dividend | $1.17 | $0.36 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $10.08B | $3.65B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -13.55% | +12.80% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $726.50M | $278.00M |
| Gross margin | 25.46% | 23.82% |
| Operating margin | 5.91% | 9.54% |
| Net margin | 7.21% | 7.62% |
| 52-week high | $143.78 | $50.59 |
| 52-week low | $98.22 | $32.43 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -24.79% | -29.10% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +15.35% | +50.04% |
| Average volume | 1.01M | 891.84K |
| Shares outstanding | 70.03M | 266.89M |
| Employees | 22,000 | 7,300 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Industrial Machinery/Components | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- AGCO has outperformed DRS by 20.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Leonardo DRS trades at a higher earnings multiple (30.1x vs 15.0x trailing P/E).
- Leonardo DRS grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+12.80% vs -13.55%).
About AGCO
AGCO stock →AGCO Corporation manufactures and distributes agricultural equipment and replacement parts worldwide. It offers horsepower tractors for row crop production, soil cultivation, planting, land leveling, seeding, and commercial hay operations; utility tractors for small- and medium-sized farms, as well as for dairy, livestock, orchards, and vineyards; and compact tractors for small farms, specialty agricultural industries, landscaping, equestrian, and residential uses.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 22,000 employees
About Leonardo DRS
DRS stock →Leonardo DRS, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides defense electronic products and systems, and military support services worldwide. It operates through Advanced Sensing and Computing and Integrated Mission Systems segments.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 7,300 employees
AGCO vs DRS FAQ
Which is bigger, AGCO or Leonardo DRS?
Leonardo DRS (DRS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $9.57B compared with $7.57B for AGCO (AGCO).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AGCO or DRS?
AGCO returned -0.89% over the past 12 months, compared with -21.04% for DRS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AGCO or DRS?
AGCO has the lower trailing P/E at 15.0, versus 30.1 for DRS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGCO or Leonardo DRS?
AGCO has the higher yield at 1.08%, compared with 1.00% for Leonardo DRS.
Are AGCO and Leonardo DRS in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.