Ashford Hospitality (AHT) vs Ryman Hospitality Properties (REIT) (RHP)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Ryman Hospitality Properties (REIT) (RHP) has outperformed Ashford Hospitality (AHT) over the past year, gaining 35.3% versus a loss of 63.5%. Over five years, RHP leads with a +42.5% price change compared with -98.5% for AHT. Ryman Hospitality Properties (REIT) is the larger company by market cap ($8.27 billion vs $14.5 million), about 572.2 times the size.
Ryman Hospitality Properties (REIT) pays a dividend yielding 3.96%, while Ashford Hospitality does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AHT | RHP |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $2.16 | $119.95 |
| Market cap | $14.46M | $8.27B |
| 1-day change | -1.82% | +0.55% |
| YTD return | -49.30% | +26.77% |
| 1-year return | -63.45% | +35.32% |
| 5-year return | -98.47% | +42.46% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 29.18 |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.15 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-23.26 | $4.11 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.96% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $4.75 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $2.58B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +10.17% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $243.43M |
| Gross margin | — | 44.08% |
| Operating margin | — | 18.90% |
| Net margin | — | 9.45% |
| 52-week high | $5.93 | $137.46 |
| 52-week low | $2.16 | $83.82 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -63.58% | -12.74% |
| Analyst consensus | — | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | — | +16.54% |
| Average volume | 25.71K | 685.51K |
| Shares outstanding | 6.47M | 68.98M |
| Employees | — | 1,012 |
| Sector | Real Estate | Real Estate |
| Industry | Real Estate Investment Trusts | Real Estate Investment Trusts |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Ryman Hospitality Properties (REIT) is about 572.2 times larger than Ashford Hospitality by market value ($8.27B vs $14.46M).
- RHP has outperformed AHT by 98.8 percentage points over the past year.
- Ryman Hospitality Properties (REIT) offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.96% vs 0.00%).
About Ashford Hospitality
AHT stock →Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, is a real estate investment trust. While our portfolio currently consists of upscale hotels and upper upscale full-service hotels, our investment strategy is predominantly focused on investing in upper upscale full-service hotels in the United States that have revenue per available room generally less than twice the U.S.
Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts
About Ryman Hospitality Properties (REIT)
RHP stock →Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. is a leading lodging and hospitality real estate investment trust that specializes in group-oriented, upscale convention center resorts and entertainment experiences.
Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 1,012 employees
AHT vs RHP FAQ
Which is bigger, Ashford Hospitality or Ryman Hospitality Properties (REIT)?
Ryman Hospitality Properties (REIT) (RHP) is larger, with a market capitalization of $8.27B compared with $14.46M for Ashford Hospitality (AHT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AHT or RHP?
RHP returned +35.32% over the past 12 months, compared with -63.45% for AHT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Ashford Hospitality or Ryman Hospitality Properties (REIT)?
Ryman Hospitality Properties (REIT) pays a dividend yielding 3.96%, while Ashford Hospitality does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Ashford Hospitality and Ryman Hospitality Properties (REIT) in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry within the Real Estate sector.