Albany International (AIN) vs Gladstone Capital (GLAD)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Albany International (AIN) has outperformed Gladstone Capital (GLAD) over the past year, gaining 6.8% versus a loss of 9.3%. Over five years, GLAD leads with a -18.1% price change compared with -26.0% for AIN. Albany International is the larger company by market cap ($1.69 billion vs $422.9 million), about 4.0 times the size.
On valuation, Gladstone Capital trades at a lower forward P/E (9.5x vs 18.7x for Albany International). Gladstone Capital offers the higher dividend yield (9.86% vs 1.87%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AIN | GLAD |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $59.40 | $18.72 |
| Market cap | $1.69B | $422.94M |
| 1-day change | +0.03% | 0.00% |
| YTD return | +17.12% | -9.39% |
| 1-year return | +6.76% | -9.35% |
| 5-year return | -26.03% | -18.11% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 8.79 |
| Forward P/E | 18.73 | 9.50 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-1.79 | $2.13 |
| Dividend yield | 1.87% | 9.86% |
| Annual dividend | $1.11 | $1.85 |
| 52-week high | $77.00 | $21.73 |
| 52-week low | $41.15 | $16.54 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -22.86% | -13.85% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +10.56% | +17.52% |
| Average volume | 271.99K | 165.58K |
| Shares outstanding | 28.37M | 22.59M |
| Employees | 5,700 | — |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Textiles | Textiles |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Albany International is about 4.0 times larger than Gladstone Capital by market value ($1.69B vs $422.94M).
- AIN has outperformed GLAD by 16.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Gladstone Capital offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (9.86% vs 1.87%).
About Albany International
AIN stock →Albany International Corp., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the machine clothing and engineered composites businesses in the United States, Switzerland, France, Brazil, China, Mexico, Germany, and internationally. The company operates through two segments: Machine Clothing (MC) and Albany Engineered Composites (AEC).
Consumer Discretionary · Textiles · 5,700 employees
About Gladstone Capital
GLAD stock →Gladstone Capital Corporation is a business development company specializing in private equity and venture capital investments with a focus on lower middle market, growth capital, add on acquisitions, change of control, buy & build strategies, debt refinancing, debt investments in senior term loans, revolving loans, secured first and second lien term loans, senior subordinated loans, unitranche loans, junior subordinated loans, and mezzanine loans and equity investments in the form of common stock, preferred stock, limited liability company interests, or warrants. The fund also makes private equity investments in acquisitions, buyouts and recapitalizations, and refinancing existing debts.
Consumer Discretionary · Textiles
AIN vs GLAD FAQ
Which is bigger, Albany International or Gladstone Capital?
Albany International (AIN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.69B compared with $422.94M for Gladstone Capital (GLAD).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AIN or GLAD?
AIN returned +6.76% over the past 12 months, compared with -9.35% for GLAD (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Albany International or Gladstone Capital?
Gladstone Capital has the higher yield at 9.86%, compared with 1.87% for Albany International.
Are Albany International and Gladstone Capital in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Textiles industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.