MetaCap

Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO) vs Virtus Investment Partners (VRTS)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO) has outperformed Virtus Investment Partners (VRTS) over the past year, gaining 6.7% versus a loss of 31.6%. Over five years, AIO leads with a -6.6% price change compared with -59.3% for VRTS. Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund is the larger company by market cap ($878.2 million vs $867.0 million), about 1.0 times the size.

On valuation, Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (6.0x vs 7.5x for Virtus Investment Partners). Virtus Investment Partners pays a dividend yielding 7.33%, while Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

AIO+6.74%VRTS-31.55%
+21%-8%-37%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
AIO-5.24%VRTS-59.72%
+9%-28%-65%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

AIO versus VRTS key metrics
MetricAIOVRTS
Share price$25.50$130.91
Market cap$878.20M$866.98M
1-day change-0.82%-0.84%
YTD return+17.24%-19.76%
1-year return+6.74%-31.55%
5-year return-6.56%-59.30%
P/E ratio (TTM)5.967.53
Forward P/E—5.43
EPS (TTM)$4.28$17.38
Dividend yield9.88%7.33%
Annual dividend$0.00$9.60
52-week high$28.60$195.00
52-week low$20.91$121.61
Distance from 52-week high-10.84%-32.87%
Analyst consensus—hold
Avg. price target upside—+11.15%
Average volume71.27K133.37K
Shares outstanding34.44M6.62M
Employees—801
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryAsset ManagementAsset Management

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • AIO has outperformed VRTS by 38.3 percentage points over the past year.
  • Virtus Investment Partners trades at a higher earnings multiple (7.5x vs 6.0x trailing P/E).
  • Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (9.88% vs 7.33%).

About Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund

AIO stock →

Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund is a closed-end multi asset fund spealizes in equity and debt securities. They prefer to invest in artificial intelligence and technology.

Financial Services · Asset Management

About Virtus Investment Partners

VRTS stock →

Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is a publicly owned investment manager.

Financial Services · Asset Management · 801 employees

AIO vs VRTS FAQ

Which is bigger, Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund or Virtus Investment Partners?

Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $878.20M compared with $866.98M for Virtus Investment Partners (VRTS).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, AIO or VRTS?

AIO returned +6.74% over the past 12 months, compared with -31.55% for VRTS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, AIO or VRTS?

AIO has the lower trailing P/E at 6.0, versus 7.5 for VRTS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund or Virtus Investment Partners?

Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund has the higher yield at 9.88%, compared with 7.33% for Virtus Investment Partners.

Are Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund and Virtus Investment Partners in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector.

More comparisons