Astera Labs (ALAB) vs Credo Technology Group (CRDO)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Astera Labs (ALAB) has outperformed Credo Technology Group (CRDO) over the past year, gaining 80.2% versus a gain of 60.4%. Astera Labs is the larger company by market cap ($60.21 billion vs $39.82 billion), about 1.5 times the size, while Credo Technology Group is growing revenue faster (+205.7% vs +115.1%). On valuation, Credo Technology Group trades at a lower forward P/E (21.9x vs 54.3x for Astera Labs).
Credo Technology Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 35.4% versus 25.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ALAB | CRDO |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $347.05 | $211.86 |
| Market cap | $60.21B | $39.82B |
| 1-day change | -9.21% | -3.70% |
| YTD return | +129.77% | +52.90% |
| 1-year return | +80.22% | +60.36% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 170.96 | 75.13 |
| Forward P/E | 54.28 | 21.86 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.03 | $2.82 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $852.52M | $1.34B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +115.13% | +205.68% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $219.13M | $472.28M |
| Gross margin | 75.69% | 68.04% |
| Operating margin | 20.34% | 33.33% |
| Net margin | 25.70% | 35.37% |
| 52-week high | $499.48 | $308.67 |
| 52-week low | $97.89 | $86.49 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -30.52% | -31.36% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +12.36% | +31.73% |
| Average volume | 4.17M | 6.90M |
| Shares outstanding | 173.49M | 187.95M |
| Employees | 756 | 807 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ALAB has outperformed CRDO by 19.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Astera Labs trades at a higher earnings multiple (171.0x vs 75.1x trailing P/E).
- Credo Technology Group is more profitable, keeping 35.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 25.7 cents for Astera Labs.
- Credo Technology Group grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+205.68% vs +115.13%).
About Astera Labs
ALAB stock →Astera Labs, Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells semiconductor-based connectivity solutions for cloud and AI infrastructure in Taiwan and the United States.
Technology · Semiconductors · 756 employees
About Credo Technology Group
CRDO stock →Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd provides various high-speed connectivity solutions for optical and electrical Ethernet and PCIe applications in the United States, Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong, and other international markets. The company offers ZeroFlap (ZF) active electrical cables and ZF optical transceivers, OmniConnect memory solutions, and a suite of retimers and DSPs for optical and copper Ethernet and PCIe, as well as integrated circuits, active electrical cables, and SerDes chiplets.
Technology · Semiconductors · 807 employees
ALAB vs CRDO FAQ
Which is bigger, Astera Labs or Credo Technology Group?
Astera Labs (ALAB) is larger, with a market capitalization of $60.21B compared with $39.82B for Credo Technology Group (CRDO).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ALAB or CRDO?
ALAB returned +80.22% over the past 12 months, compared with +60.36% for CRDO (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ALAB or CRDO?
CRDO has the lower trailing P/E at 75.1, versus 171.0 for ALAB. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Are Astera Labs and Credo Technology Group in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector.