MetaCap

Alamo Group (ALG) vs Global Industrial (GIC)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Global Industrial (GIC) has outperformed Alamo Group (ALG) over the past year, gaining 24.1% versus a loss of 16.5%. Over five years, GIC leads with a +8.6% price change compared with +6.7% for ALG. Alamo Group is the larger company by market cap ($1.91 billion vs $1.64 billion), about 1.2 times the size.

On valuation, Alamo Group trades at a lower forward P/E (12.9x vs 19.5x for Global Industrial). Global Industrial offers the higher dividend yield (2.51% vs 0.82%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ALG-16.45%GIC+24.06%
+28%+1%-26%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ALG+9.25%GIC+10.55%
+64%+7%-50%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ALG versus GIC key metrics
MetricALGGIC
Share price$156.91$43.05
Market cap$1.91B$1.64B
1-day change-3.21%-0.90%
YTD return-6.53%+47.33%
1-year return-16.45%+24.06%
5-year return+6.71%+8.60%
P/E ratio (TTM)18.8119.66
Forward P/E12.8919.52
EPS (TTM)$8.34$2.19
Dividend yield0.82%2.51%
Annual dividend$1.28$1.08
52-week high$219.88$44.36
52-week low$145.76$26.40
Distance from 52-week high-28.64%-2.95%
Analyst consensusnonehold
Avg. price target upside+30.52%-2.44%
Average volume162.96K131.80K
Shares outstanding12.17M38.11M
Employees3,8001,980
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial Machinery/ComponentsIndustrial Machinery/Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • GIC has outperformed ALG by 40.5 percentage points over the past year.
  • Global Industrial offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.51% vs 0.82%).

About Alamo Group

ALG stock →

Alamo Group Inc. manufactures and sells industrial and vegetation management equipment for governmental, industrial, and agricultural uses worldwide.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 3,800 employees

About Global Industrial

GIC stock →

Global Industrial Company, through its subsidiaries, operates as an industrial distributor of various industrial and maintenance, repair, and operation (MRO) products in the United States and Canada. It offers storage and shelving products, safety and security products, carts and trucks, HVAC and fans, furniture and decor, material handling products, janitorial and facility maintenance products, workbenches and shop desks, tools and instruments, plumbing and pumps, office and school supplies, packaging and shipping products, lighting and electrical products, foodservice and retail products, medical and laboratory products, motors and power transmission products, building supplies, machining products, fasteners and hardware, vehicle maintenance products, and raw materials.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 1,980 employees

ALG vs GIC FAQ

Which is bigger, Alamo Group or Global Industrial?

Alamo Group (ALG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.91B compared with $1.64B for Global Industrial (GIC).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ALG or GIC?

GIC returned +24.06% over the past 12 months, compared with -16.45% for ALG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ALG or GIC?

ALG has the lower trailing P/E at 18.8, versus 19.7 for GIC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Alamo Group or Global Industrial?

Global Industrial has the higher yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.82% for Alamo Group.

Are Alamo Group and Global Industrial in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons