Allstate (ALL) vs W.R. Berkley (WRB)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Allstate (ALL) has outperformed W.R. Berkley (WRB) over the past year, gaining 6.1% versus a loss of 10.3%. Over five years, WRB leads with a +101.7% price change compared with +77.3% for ALL. Allstate is the larger company by market cap ($56.63 billion vs $25.89 billion), about 2.2 times the size, while W.R. Berkley is growing revenue faster (+7.8% vs +5.6%).
On valuation, Allstate trades at a lower forward P/E (8.0x vs 14.3x for W.R. Berkley). Allstate offers the higher dividend yield (1.86% vs 0.53%). Allstate converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 15.2% versus 12.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ALL | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $223.95 | $69.73 |
| Market cap | $56.63B | $25.89B |
| 1-day change | -0.14% | +0.11% |
| YTD return | +7.98% | -0.56% |
| 1-year return | +6.13% | -10.34% |
| 5-year return | +77.32% | +101.71% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 4.48 | 14.35 |
| Forward P/E | 8.01 | 14.29 |
| EPS (TTM) | $49.98 | $4.86 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 0.53% |
| Annual dividend | $4.16 | $0.37 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $67.69B | $14.71B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +5.58% | +7.84% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $10.28B | $1.78B |
| Net margin | 15.19% | 12.10% |
| 52-week high | $277.22 | $78.96 |
| 52-week low | $188.08 | $62.87 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -19.22% | -11.69% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +20.91% | -0.96% |
| Average volume | 1.89M | 2.49M |
| Shares outstanding | 252.86M | 371.23M |
| Employees | 53,000 | 8,804 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Property-Casualty Insurers | Property-Casualty Insurers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Allstate is about 2.2 times larger than W.R. Berkley by market value ($56.63B vs $25.89B).
- ALL has outperformed WRB by 16.5 percentage points over the past year.
- W.R. Berkley trades at a higher earnings multiple (14.3x vs 4.5x trailing P/E).
- Allstate offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.86% vs 0.53%).
About Allstate
ALL stock →The Allstate Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, provides property and casualty, and other insurance products in the United States and Canada. It operates in four segments: Allstate Protection; Run-off Property-Liability; Protection Services; and Corporate and Other.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 53,000 employees
About W.R. Berkley
WRB stock →W. R.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 8,804 employees
ALL vs WRB FAQ
Which is bigger, Allstate or W.R. Berkley?
Allstate (ALL) is larger, with a market capitalization of $56.63B compared with $25.89B for W.R. Berkley (WRB).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ALL or WRB?
ALL returned +6.13% over the past 12 months, compared with -10.34% for WRB (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ALL or WRB?
ALL has the lower trailing P/E at 4.5, versus 14.3 for WRB. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Allstate or W.R. Berkley?
Allstate has the higher yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.53% for W.R. Berkley.
Are Allstate and W.R. Berkley in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Property-Casualty Insurers industry within the Finance sector.