Applied Materials (AMAT) vs Intel (INTC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Intel (INTC) has outperformed Applied Materials (AMAT) over the past year, gaining 204.3% versus a gain of 146.1%. Over five years, AMAT leads with a +295.7% price change compared with +107.7% for INTC. Intel is the larger company by market cap ($597.96 billion vs $413.19 billion), about 1.4 times the size, while Applied Materials is growing revenue faster (+4.4% vs -0.5%).
On valuation, Applied Materials trades at a lower forward P/E (28.2x vs 54.3x for Intel). Applied Materials pays a dividend yielding 0.38%, while Intel does not currently pay one. Applied Materials converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 24.7% versus -0.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AMAT | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $520.65 | $113.12 |
| Market cap | $413.19B | $597.96B |
| 1-day change | -1.81% | +0.55% |
| YTD return | +102.60% | +206.56% |
| 1-year return | +146.10% | +204.33% |
| 5-year return | +295.66% | +107.71% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 44.92 | — |
| Forward P/E | 28.20 | 54.31 |
| EPS (TTM) | $11.59 | $-2.12 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $1.98 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $28.37B | $52.85B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +4.39% | -0.47% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $7.00B | $-267.00M |
| Gross margin | 48.67% | 34.77% |
| Operating margin | 29.22% | -4.19% |
| Net margin | 24.67% | -0.51% |
| 52-week high | $739.67 | $142.35 |
| 52-week low | $203.40 | $32.89 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -29.61% | -20.53% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +22.72% | +4.36% |
| Average volume | 7.11M | 107.11M |
| Shares outstanding | 793.60M | 5.29B |
| Employees | 38,900 | 85,100 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- INTC has outperformed AMAT by 58.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Applied Materials is more profitable, keeping 24.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -0.5 cents for Intel.
About Applied Materials
AMAT stock →Applied Materials, Inc. provides materials engineering solutions, equipment, services, and software to the semiconductor and related industries in the United States, China, Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Southeast Asia, Europe, and internationally.
Technology · Semiconductors · 38,900 employees
About Intel
INTC stock →Intel Corporation designs, develops, manufactures, markets, sells, and services computing and related end products and services in the United States, Ireland, Israel, and internationally. It operates through three segments: CCG, DCAI, and Intel Foundry.
Technology · Semiconductors · 85,100 employees
AMAT vs INTC FAQ
Which is bigger, Applied Materials or Intel?
Intel (INTC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $597.96B compared with $413.19B for Applied Materials (AMAT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AMAT or INTC?
INTC returned +204.33% over the past 12 months, compared with +146.10% for AMAT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Applied Materials or Intel?
Applied Materials pays a dividend yielding 0.38%, while Intel does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Applied Materials and Intel in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector.