MetaCap

Affiliated Managers Group (AMG) vs Blue Owl Capital (OWL)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Affiliated Managers Group (AMG) has outperformed Blue Owl Capital (OWL) over the past year, gaining 57.2% versus a loss of 43.5%. Over five years, AMG leads with a +135.6% price change compared with -42.7% for OWL. Blue Owl Capital is the larger company by market cap ($14.44 billion vs $10.09 billion), about 1.4 times the size.

On valuation, Affiliated Managers Group trades at a lower forward P/E (9.1x vs 9.4x for Blue Owl Capital). Blue Owl Capital offers the higher dividend yield (9.88% vs 0.01%). Affiliated Managers Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 34.5% versus 13.9%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

AMG+57.15%OWL-43.45%
+65%+5%-54%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
AMG+146.50%OWL-40.65%
+156%+50%-56%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

AMG versus OWL key metrics
MetricAMGOWL
Share price$390.15$9.22
Market cap$10.09B$14.44B
1-day change+3.46%+1.15%
YTD return+30.81%-39.02%
1-year return+57.15%-43.45%
5-year return+135.62%-42.67%
P/E ratio (TTM)13.6776.79
Forward P/E9.119.36
EPS (TTM)$28.54$0.12
Dividend yield0.01%9.88%
Annual dividend$0.04$0.91
Revenue (latest FY)$2.07B$567.75M
Revenue growth (YoY)+1.64%+7.56%
Net income (latest FY)$716.60M$78.83M
Net margin34.54%13.89%
52-week high$392.92$17.33
52-week low$230.26$7.95
Distance from 52-week high-0.70%-46.83%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+12.89%+35.97%
Average volume275.52K18.98M
Shares outstanding25.86M683.91M
Employees5,6001,380
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryInvestment ManagersInvestment Managers

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • AMG has outperformed OWL by 100.6 percentage points over the past year.
  • Blue Owl Capital trades at a higher earnings multiple (76.8x vs 13.7x trailing P/E).
  • Blue Owl Capital offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (9.88% vs 0.01%).
  • Affiliated Managers Group is more profitable, keeping 34.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 13.9 cents for Blue Owl Capital.
  • Blue Owl Capital grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+7.56% vs +1.64%).

About Affiliated Managers Group

AMG stock →

Affiliated Managers Group, Inc., through its affiliates, operates as an investment management company providing investment management services to mutual funds, institutional clients,retails and high net worth individuals in the United States. It provides advisory or sub-advisory services to mutual funds.

Finance · Investment Managers · 5,600 employees

About Blue Owl Capital

OWL stock →

Blue Owl Capital Inc. operates as an alternative asset manager in the United States.

Finance · Investment Managers · 1,380 employees

AMG vs OWL FAQ

Which is bigger, Affiliated Managers Group or Blue Owl Capital?

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) is larger, with a market capitalization of $14.44B compared with $10.09B for Affiliated Managers Group (AMG).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, AMG or OWL?

AMG returned +57.15% over the past 12 months, compared with -43.45% for OWL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, AMG or OWL?

AMG has the lower trailing P/E at 13.7, versus 76.8 for OWL. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Affiliated Managers Group or Blue Owl Capital?

Blue Owl Capital has the higher yield at 9.88%, compared with 0.01% for Affiliated Managers Group.

Are Affiliated Managers Group and Blue Owl Capital in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons