MetaCap

Amazon.com (AMZN) vs Walmart (WMT)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Amazon.com (AMZN) has outperformed Walmart (WMT) over the past year, gaining 16.9% versus a gain of 4.9%. Over five years, WMT leads with a +131.2% price change compared with +52.0% for AMZN. Amazon.com is the larger company by market cap ($2.80 trillion vs $860.75 billion), about 3.3 times the size.

On valuation, Amazon.com trades at a lower forward P/E (24.8x vs 33.5x for Walmart). Walmart pays a dividend yielding 0.89%, while Amazon.com does not currently pay one. Amazon.com converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 10.8% versus 3.1%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

AMZN+17.32%WMT+5.46%
+33%+10%-12%
Oct 6, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
AMZN+57.60%WMT+132.65%
+199%+69%-61%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

AMZN versus WMT key metrics
MetricAMZNWMT
Share price$259.92$108.16
Market cap$2.80T$860.75B
1-day change+1.42%+0.90%
YTD return+12.27%-2.79%
1-year return+16.85%+4.91%
5-year return+52.04%+131.17%
P/E ratio (TTM)20.9138.35
Forward P/E24.8333.54
EPS (TTM)$12.43$2.82
Dividend yield0.00%0.89%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.965
Revenue (latest FY)$716.92B$713.16B
Revenue growth (YoY)+12.38%+4.73%
Net income (latest FY)$77.67B$21.89B
Gross margin50.29%24.93%
Operating margin11.16%4.18%
Net margin10.83%3.07%
52-week high$287.20$135.16
52-week low$196.00$98.88
Distance from 52-week high-9.50%-19.98%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+27.55%+17.22%
Average volume39.07M23.68M
Shares outstanding10.79B7.96B
Employees1,595,0002,100,000
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Defensive
IndustryInternet RetailDiscount Stores

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Amazon.com is about 3.3 times larger than Walmart by market value ($2.80T vs $860.75B).
  • AMZN has outperformed WMT by 11.9 percentage points over the past year.
  • Walmart trades at a higher earnings multiple (38.4x vs 20.9x trailing P/E).
  • Amazon.com is more profitable, keeping 10.8 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 3.1 cents for Walmart.
  • Amazon.com grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+12.38% vs +4.73%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Amazon.com in Consumer Cyclical and Walmart in Consumer Defensive.

About Amazon.com

AMZN stock →

Amazon.com, Inc. engages in the retail sale of consumer products, advertising, and subscriptions service through online and physical stores in North America and internationally.

Consumer Cyclical · Internet Retail · 1,595,000 employees

About Walmart

WMT stock →

Walmart Inc. engages in the operation of retail and wholesale stores and clubs, ecommerce websites, and mobile applications worldwide.

Consumer Defensive · Discount Stores · 2,100,000 employees

AMZN vs WMT FAQ

Which is bigger, Amazon.com or Walmart?

Amazon.com (AMZN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.80T compared with $860.75B for Walmart (WMT).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, AMZN or WMT?

AMZN returned +16.85% over the past 12 months, compared with +4.91% for WMT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, AMZN or WMT?

AMZN has the lower trailing P/E at 20.9, versus 38.4 for WMT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Amazon.com or Walmart?

Walmart pays a dividend yielding 0.89%, while Amazon.com does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Amazon.com and Walmart in the same industry?

No. Amazon.com is in the Consumer Cyclical sector, while Walmart is in Consumer Defensive.

More comparisons