A.O. Smith (AOS) vs Whirlpool (WHR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.
Summary
A.O. Smith (AOS) has outperformed Whirlpool (WHR) over the past year, losing 19.1% versus a loss of 61.3%. Over five years, AOS leads with a -14.2% price change compared with -86.1% for WHR. A.O. Smith is the larger company by market cap ($7.66 billion vs $1.88 billion), about 4.1 times the size.
On valuation, Whirlpool trades at a lower forward P/E (8.0x vs 13.8x for A.O. Smith). Whirlpool offers the higher dividend yield (9.37% vs 2.52%). A.O. Smith converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 14.3% versus 2.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AOS | WHR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $56.38 | $28.83 |
| Market cap | $7.66B | $1.88B |
| 1-day change | -0.32% | -1.13% |
| YTD return | -15.70% | -60.04% |
| 1-year return | -19.15% | -61.28% |
| 5-year return | -14.19% | -86.05% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 15.75 | 9.48 |
| Forward P/E | 13.80 | 8.01 |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.58 | $3.04 |
| Dividend yield | 2.52% | 9.37% |
| Annual dividend | $1.42 | $2.70 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.83B | $15.52B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +0.32% | -6.52% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $546.20M | $318.00M |
| Gross margin | 38.83% | 15.37% |
| Operating margin | 19.02% | 5.40% |
| Net margin | 14.26% | 2.05% |
| 52-week high | $81.87 | $94.82 |
| 52-week low | $54.16 | $28.39 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -31.13% | -69.60% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +24.00% | +72.84% |
| Average volume | 1.53M | 2.58M |
| Shares outstanding | 110.05M | 65.20M |
| Employees | 11,500 | 41,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Consumer Electronics/Appliances | Consumer Electronics/Appliances |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- A.O. Smith is about 4.1 times larger than Whirlpool by market value ($7.66B vs $1.88B).
- AOS has outperformed WHR by 42.1 percentage points over the past year.
- A.O. Smith trades at a higher earnings multiple (15.7x vs 9.5x trailing P/E).
- Whirlpool offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (9.37% vs 2.52%).
- A.O. Smith is more profitable, keeping 14.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 2.0 cents for Whirlpool.
- A.O. Smith grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+0.32% vs -6.52%).
About A.O. Smith
AOS stock →A. O.
Consumer Discretionary · Consumer Electronics/Appliances · 11,500 employees
About Whirlpool
WHR stock →Whirlpool Corporation manufactures and markets home appliances and related products and services in the North America, Latin America, and internationally. The company's principal products include refrigerators, freezers, ice makers, and refrigerator water filters; laundry appliances, and commercial laundry products and related laundry accessories; cooking and other small domestic appliances; and dishwasher appliances and related accessories, as well as mixers.
Consumer Discretionary · Consumer Electronics/Appliances · 41,000 employees
AOS vs WHR FAQ
Which is bigger, A.O. Smith or Whirlpool?
A.O. Smith (AOS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $7.66B compared with $1.88B for Whirlpool (WHR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AOS or WHR?
AOS returned -19.15% over the past 12 months, compared with -61.28% for WHR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AOS or WHR?
WHR has the lower trailing P/E at 9.5, versus 15.7 for AOS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, A.O. Smith or Whirlpool?
Whirlpool has the higher yield at 9.37%, compared with 2.52% for A.O. Smith.
Are A.O. Smith and Whirlpool in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Consumer Electronics/Appliances industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.