Apollo Global Management (New) (APO) vs Franklin Templeton (BEN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Franklin Templeton (BEN) has outperformed Apollo Global Management (New) (APO) over the past year, gaining 38.8% versus a loss of 8.3%. Over five years, APO leads with a +71.4% price change compared with +8.1% for BEN. Apollo Global Management (New) is the larger company by market cap ($68.15 billion vs $16.39 billion), about 4.2 times the size.
On valuation, Franklin Templeton trades at a lower forward P/E (10.2x vs 10.8x for Apollo Global Management (New)). Franklin Templeton offers the higher dividend yield (4.06% vs 1.86%). Apollo Global Management (New) converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 10.9% versus 6.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | APO | BEN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $115.41 | $32.26 |
| Market cap | $68.15B | $16.39B |
| 1-day change | -0.13% | -0.68% |
| YTD return | -20.18% | +35.96% |
| 1-year return | -8.33% | +38.80% |
| 5-year return | +71.39% | +8.09% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 41.36 | 21.95 |
| Forward P/E | 10.79 | 10.16 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.79 | $1.47 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 4.06% |
| Annual dividend | $2.15 | $1.31 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $32.05B | $8.77B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +22.73% | +3.45% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $3.49B | $524.90M |
| Operating margin | — | 6.89% |
| Net margin | 10.90% | 5.98% |
| 52-week high | $153.29 | $36.28 |
| 52-week low | $99.56 | $21.11 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -24.71% | -11.08% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +31.23% | +11.13% |
| Average volume | 3.35M | 4.06M |
| Shares outstanding | 590.54M | 508.08M |
| Employees | 6,140 | 10,100 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Apollo Global Management (New) is about 4.2 times larger than Franklin Templeton by market value ($68.15B vs $16.39B).
- BEN has outperformed APO by 47.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Apollo Global Management (New) trades at a higher earnings multiple (41.4x vs 21.9x trailing P/E).
- Franklin Templeton offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.06% vs 1.86%).
- Apollo Global Management (New) grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+22.73% vs +3.45%).
About Apollo Global Management (New)
APO stock →Apollo Global Management, Inc. is a private equity firm specializing in investments in credit, private equity, infrastructure, secondaries and real estate markets.
Finance · Investment Managers · 6,140 employees
About Franklin Templeton
BEN stock →Franklin Templeton Inc. is a publicly owned asset investment manager.
Finance · Investment Managers · 10,100 employees
APO vs BEN FAQ
Which is bigger, Apollo Global Management (New) or Franklin Templeton?
Apollo Global Management (New) (APO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $68.15B compared with $16.39B for Franklin Templeton (BEN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, APO or BEN?
BEN returned +38.80% over the past 12 months, compared with -8.33% for APO (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, APO or BEN?
BEN has the lower trailing P/E at 21.9, versus 41.4 for APO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Apollo Global Management (New) or Franklin Templeton?
Franklin Templeton has the higher yield at 4.06%, compared with 1.86% for Apollo Global Management (New).
Are Apollo Global Management (New) and Franklin Templeton in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.