Algonquin Power & Utilities (AQN) vs Pampa Energia S.A. (PAM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Pampa Energia S.A. (PAM) has outperformed Algonquin Power & Utilities (AQN) over the past year, gaining 32.2% versus a loss of 13.8%. Over five years, PAM leads with a +312.3% price change compared with -66.2% for AQN. Pampa Energia S.A. is the larger company by market cap ($4.30 billion vs $3.93 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
On valuation, Pampa Energia S.A. trades at a lower forward P/E (6.8x vs 12.5x for Algonquin Power & Utilities). Algonquin Power & Utilities pays a dividend yielding 5.10%, while Pampa Energia S.A. does not currently pay one. Pampa Energia S.A. converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 33.0% versus 7.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AQN | PAM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $5.10 | $80.22 |
| Market cap | $3.93B | $4.30B |
| 1-day change | +0.39% | -0.57% |
| YTD return | -17.40% | -8.85% |
| 1-year return | -13.75% | +32.15% |
| 5-year return | -66.25% | +312.26% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 21.25 | 7.29 |
| Forward P/E | 12.49 | 6.84 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.24 | $11.00 |
| Dividend yield | 5.10% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.26 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.43B | $1.88B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +4.92% | +8.31% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $180.80M | $619.00M |
| Gross margin | — | 31.82% |
| Operating margin | 20.74% | 23.45% |
| Net margin | 7.43% | 33.00% |
| 52-week high | $7.11 | $94.50 |
| 52-week low | $4.91 | $58.50 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -28.27% | -15.11% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +29.02% | +50.94% |
| Average volume | 4.09M | 172.38K |
| Shares outstanding | 769.90M | 53.60M |
| Employees | 3,233 | — |
| Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
| Industry | Electric Utilities: Central | Electric Utilities: Central |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PAM has outperformed AQN by 45.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Algonquin Power & Utilities trades at a higher earnings multiple (21.3x vs 7.3x trailing P/E).
- Algonquin Power & Utilities offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.10% vs 0.00%).
- Pampa Energia S.A. is more profitable, keeping 33.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 7.4 cents for Algonquin Power & Utilities.
About Algonquin Power & Utilities
AQN stock →Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. operates in the power and utility industries.
Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central · 3,233 employees
About Pampa Energia S.A.
PAM stock →Pampa Energía S.A. operates as an integrated power company in Argentina.
Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central
AQN vs PAM FAQ
Which is bigger, Algonquin Power & Utilities or Pampa Energia S.A.?
Pampa Energia S.A. (PAM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.30B compared with $3.93B for Algonquin Power & Utilities (AQN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AQN or PAM?
PAM returned +32.15% over the past 12 months, compared with -13.75% for AQN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AQN or PAM?
PAM has the lower trailing P/E at 7.3, versus 21.3 for AQN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Algonquin Power & Utilities or Pampa Energia S.A.?
Algonquin Power & Utilities pays a dividend yielding 5.10%, while Pampa Energia S.A. does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Algonquin Power & Utilities and Pampa Energia S.A. in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Electric Utilities: Central industry within the Utilities sector.