MetaCap

Arrow Electronics (ARW) vs Bel Fuse (BELFB)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Arrow Electronics (ARW) has outperformed Bel Fuse (BELFB) over the past year, gaining 94.0% versus a gain of 74.7%. Over five years, BELFB leads with a +1896.1% price change compared with +96.7% for ARW. Arrow Electronics is the larger company by market cap ($11.81 billion vs $3.56 billion), about 3.3 times the size, while Bel Fuse is growing revenue faster (+26.3% vs +10.5%).

On valuation, Arrow Electronics trades at a lower forward P/E (9.7x vs 23.0x for Bel Fuse). Bel Fuse pays a dividend yielding 0.10%, while Arrow Electronics does not currently pay one. Bel Fuse converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 9.1% versus 1.9%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ARW+94.03%BELFB+74.67%
+143%+60%-22%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ARW+97.72%BELFB+1864.33%
+2493%+1176%-141%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ARW versus BELFB key metrics
MetricARWBELFB
Share price$232.00$246.72
Market cap$11.81B$3.56B
1-day change-3.49%-5.20%
YTD return+110.56%+45.45%
1-year return+94.03%+74.67%
5-year return+96.73%+1896.12%
P/E ratio (TTM)14.8363.75
Forward P/E9.7023.03
EPS (TTM)$15.64$3.87
Dividend yield0.00%0.10%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.24
Revenue (latest FY)$30.85B$675.46M
Revenue growth (YoY)+10.49%+26.30%
Net income (latest FY)$571.27M$61.54M
Gross margin11.24%39.15%
Operating margin2.66%16.43%
Net margin1.85%9.11%
52-week high$249.43$335.29
52-week low$101.79$129.94
Distance from 52-week high-6.99%-26.42%
Analyst consensusnonenone
Avg. price target upside+1.29%+33.62%
Average volume564.85K197.92K
Shares outstanding50.91M12.32M
Employees22,2304,964
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryElectronic ComponentsElectronic Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Arrow Electronics is about 3.3 times larger than Bel Fuse by market value ($11.81B vs $3.56B).
  • ARW has outperformed BELFB by 19.4 percentage points over the past year.
  • Bel Fuse trades at a higher earnings multiple (63.8x vs 14.8x trailing P/E).
  • Bel Fuse is more profitable, keeping 9.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 1.9 cents for Arrow Electronics.
  • Bel Fuse grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+26.30% vs +10.49%).

About Arrow Electronics

ARW stock →

Arrow Electronics, Inc. sources and engineers technology for manufacturers, service providers, and users of enterprise computing solutions in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific.

Technology · Electronic Components · 22,230 employees

About Bel Fuse

BELFB stock →

Bel Fuse Inc. designs, manufactures, markets, and sells products that power, protect, and connect electronic circuits.

Technology · Electronic Components · 4,964 employees

ARW vs BELFB FAQ

Which is bigger, Arrow Electronics or Bel Fuse?

Arrow Electronics (ARW) is larger, with a market capitalization of $11.81B compared with $3.56B for Bel Fuse (BELFB).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ARW or BELFB?

ARW returned +94.03% over the past 12 months, compared with +74.67% for BELFB (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ARW or BELFB?

ARW has the lower trailing P/E at 14.8, versus 63.8 for BELFB. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Arrow Electronics or Bel Fuse?

Bel Fuse pays a dividend yielding 0.10%, while Arrow Electronics does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Arrow Electronics and Bel Fuse in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Electronic Components industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons