MetaCap

ASML N.V. New York Registry Shares (ASML) vs Danaher (DHR)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

ASML N.V. New York Registry Shares (ASML) has outperformed Danaher (DHR) over the past year, gaining 80.1% versus a gain of 4.7%. Over five years, ASML leads with a +128.6% price change compared with -18.2% for DHR. ASML N.V. New York Registry Shares is the larger company by market cap ($693.29 billion vs $153.60 billion), about 4.5 times the size.

On valuation, Danaher trades at a lower forward P/E (23.5x vs 31.0x for ASML N.V. New York Registry Shares). Danaher offers the higher dividend yield (0.66% vs 0.24%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ASML+80.08%DHR+4.66%
+105%+38%-28%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ASML+147.16%DHR-17.78%
+175%+58%-59%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ASML versus DHR key metrics
MetricASMLDHR
Share price$1,804.96$218.49
Market cap$693.29B$153.60B
1-day change-1.59%+1.34%
YTD return+68.71%-4.56%
1-year return+80.08%+4.66%
5-year return+128.65%-18.22%
P/E ratio (TTM)59.5338.47
Forward P/E31.0023.50
EPS (TTM)$30.32$5.68
Dividend yield0.24%0.66%
Annual dividend$4.30$1.44
Revenue (latest FY)—$24.57B
Revenue growth (YoY)—+2.90%
Net income (latest FY)—$3.61B
Gross margin—59.11%
Operating margin—19.09%
Net margin—14.71%
52-week high$1,999.96$242.80
52-week low$935.41$160.93
Distance from 52-week high-9.75%-10.01%
Analyst consensusstrong_buystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+16.40%+9.41%
Average volume1.48M4.71M
Shares outstanding384.10M702.99M
Employees43,93858,000
SectorTechnologyIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial Machinery/ComponentsIndustrial Machinery/Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • ASML N.V. New York Registry Shares is about 4.5 times larger than Danaher by market value ($693.29B vs $153.60B).
  • ASML has outperformed DHR by 75.4 percentage points over the past year.
  • ASML N.V. New York Registry Shares trades at a higher earnings multiple (59.5x vs 38.5x trailing P/E).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: ASML N.V. New York Registry Shares in Technology and Danaher in Industrials.

About ASML N.V. New York Registry Shares

ASML stock →

ASML Holding N.V. provides lithography solutions for the development, production, marketing, sales, upgrading, and servicing of advanced semiconductor equipment systems.

Technology · Industrial Machinery/Components · 43,938 employees

About Danaher

DHR stock →

Danaher Corporation designs, manufactures, and markets professional, medical, research, and industrial products and services in the United States, China, and internationally. The company operates through Biotechnology, Life Sciences, and Diagnostics segments.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 58,000 employees

ASML vs DHR FAQ

Which is bigger, ASML N.V. New York Registry Shares or Danaher?

ASML N.V. New York Registry Shares (ASML) is larger, with a market capitalization of $693.29B compared with $153.60B for Danaher (DHR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ASML or DHR?

ASML returned +80.08% over the past 12 months, compared with +4.66% for DHR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ASML or DHR?

DHR has the lower trailing P/E at 38.5, versus 59.5 for ASML. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, ASML N.V. New York Registry Shares or Danaher?

Danaher has the higher yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.24% for ASML N.V. New York Registry Shares.

Are ASML N.V. New York Registry Shares and Danaher in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons