A10 Networks (ATEN) vs Cisco Systems (CSCO)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Cisco Systems (CSCO) has outperformed A10 Networks (ATEN) over the past year, gaining 63.4% versus a gain of 51.5%. Over five years, CSCO leads with a +107.9% price change compared with +103.1% for ATEN. Cisco Systems is the larger company by market cap ($462.09 billion vs $2.10 billion), about 219.8 times the size.
On valuation, Cisco Systems trades at a lower forward P/E (20.9x vs 24.4x for A10 Networks). Cisco Systems offers the higher dividend yield (1.42% vs 0.83%). Cisco Systems converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 21.0% versus 14.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ATEN | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $28.96 | $117.21 |
| Market cap | $2.10B | $462.09B |
| 1-day change | +3.56% | +2.01% |
| YTD return | +58.06% | +49.15% |
| 1-year return | +51.54% | +63.36% |
| 5-year return | +103.05% | +107.95% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 49.92 | 35.20 |
| Forward P/E | 24.42 | 20.85 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.58 | $3.33 |
| Dividend yield | 0.83% | 1.42% |
| Annual dividend | $0.24 | $1.66 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $290.56M | $63.33B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +11.03% | +11.77% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $42.14M | $13.27B |
| Gross margin | 79.34% | 64.52% |
| Operating margin | 16.22% | 24.27% |
| Net margin | 14.50% | 20.95% |
| 52-week high | $38.49 | $130.37 |
| 52-week low | $16.52 | $66.81 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -24.77% | -10.10% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +26.64% | +16.17% |
| Average volume | 1.28M | 19.44M |
| Shares outstanding | 72.61M | 3.94B |
| Employees | 494 | 82,400 |
| Sector | Telecommunications | Telecommunications |
| Industry | Computer Communications Equipment | Computer Communications Equipment |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Cisco Systems is about 219.8 times larger than A10 Networks by market value ($462.09B vs $2.10B).
- CSCO has outperformed ATEN by 11.8 percentage points over the past year.
- A10 Networks trades at a higher earnings multiple (49.9x vs 35.2x trailing P/E).
- Cisco Systems is more profitable, keeping 21.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 14.5 cents for A10 Networks.
About A10 Networks
ATEN stock →A10 Networks, Inc. provides secure application and network infrastructure solutions in the United States, the rest of Americas, Japan, rest of the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.
Telecommunications · Computer Communications Equipment · 494 employees
About Cisco Systems
CSCO stock →Cisco Systems, Inc. designs, develops, and sells technologies to power, help, secure, and draw insights from the internet in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia Pacific, Japan, and China.
Telecommunications · Computer Communications Equipment · 82,400 employees
ATEN vs CSCO FAQ
Which is bigger, A10 Networks or Cisco Systems?
Cisco Systems (CSCO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $462.09B compared with $2.10B for A10 Networks (ATEN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ATEN or CSCO?
CSCO returned +63.36% over the past 12 months, compared with +51.54% for ATEN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ATEN or CSCO?
CSCO has the lower trailing P/E at 35.2, versus 49.9 for ATEN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, A10 Networks or Cisco Systems?
Cisco Systems has the higher yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.83% for A10 Networks.
Are A10 Networks and Cisco Systems in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Computer Communications Equipment industry within the Telecommunications sector.