MetaCap

Austin Gold (AUST) vs Namib Minerals (NAMM)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Austin Gold (AUST) has outperformed Namib Minerals (NAMM) over the past year, losing 55.9% versus a loss of 64.7%. Namib Minerals is the larger company by market cap ($62.0 million vs $13.3 million), about 4.7 times the size.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

AUST-55.86%NAMM-64.74%
+114%+17%-79%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
AUST-35.95%NAMM-96.48%
+65%-20%-105%
Jun 2, 20255 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

AUST versus NAMM key metrics
MetricAUSTNAMM
Share price$0.9701$1.11
Market cap$13.28M$62.00M
1-day change-1.01%+0.91%
YTD return-33.78%+8.91%
1-year return-55.86%-64.74%
P/E ratio (TTM)—0.56
Forward P/E—0.60
EPS (TTM)$-0.18$1.99
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
52-week high$3.92$7.42
52-week low$0.87$0.914
Distance from 52-week high-75.25%-85.04%
Average volume78.97K1.02M
Shares outstanding13.69M55.85M
SectorBasic MaterialsBasic Materials
IndustryPrecious MetalsPrecious Metals

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Namib Minerals is about 4.7 times larger than Austin Gold by market value ($62.00M vs $13.28M).

AUST vs NAMM FAQ

Which is bigger, Austin Gold or Namib Minerals?

Namib Minerals (NAMM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $62.00M compared with $13.28M for Austin Gold (AUST).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, AUST or NAMM?

AUST returned -55.86% over the past 12 months, compared with -64.74% for NAMM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Are Austin Gold and Namib Minerals in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Precious Metals industry within the Basic Materials sector.

More comparisons