Avnet (AVT) vs TE Connectivity (TEL)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Avnet (AVT) has outperformed TE Connectivity (TEL) over the past year, gaining 99.7% versus a loss of 2.8%. Over five years, AVT leads with a +173.6% price change compared with +46.5% for TEL. TE Connectivity is the larger company by market cap ($61.64 billion vs $8.40 billion), about 7.3 times the size, while Avnet is growing revenue faster (+24.5% vs +8.9%).
On valuation, Avnet trades at a lower forward P/E (9.2x vs 16.5x for TE Connectivity). Avnet offers the higher dividend yield (1.37% vs 1.37%). TE Connectivity converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 10.7% versus 1.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AVT | TEL |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $102.12 | $212.91 |
| Market cap | $8.40B | $61.64B |
| 1-day change | -0.40% | -1.35% |
| YTD return | +113.25% | -5.13% |
| 1-year return | +99.71% | -2.81% |
| 5-year return | +173.56% | +46.52% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 25.47 | 20.85 |
| Forward P/E | 9.24 | 16.48 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.01 | $10.21 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 1.37% |
| Annual dividend | $1.40 | $2.91 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $27.63B | $17.26B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +24.47% | +8.94% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $334.39M | $1.84B |
| Gross margin | 10.43% | 35.22% |
| Operating margin | 2.62% | 18.60% |
| Net margin | 1.21% | 10.67% |
| 52-week high | $108.63 | $252.56 |
| 52-week low | $44.25 | $190.27 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -6.00% | -15.70% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +4.05% | +17.15% |
| Average volume | 1.24M | 2.19M |
| Shares outstanding | 82.23M | 289.51M |
| Employees | 15,040 | 90,000 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Electronic Components | Electronic Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- TE Connectivity is about 7.3 times larger than Avnet by market value ($61.64B vs $8.40B).
- AVT has outperformed TEL by 102.5 percentage points over the past year.
- TE Connectivity is more profitable, keeping 10.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 1.2 cents for Avnet.
- Avnet grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+24.47% vs +8.94%).
About Avnet
AVT stock →Avnet, Inc., engages in the distribution of electronic component technology in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia/Pacific. The company operates through two segments, Electronic Components and Farnell.
Technology · Electronic Components · 15,040 employees
About TE Connectivity
TEL stock →TE Connectivity plc, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and sells connectivity and sensor solutions in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the AsiaPacific, and the Americas. The company operates through two reportable segments, Transportation Solutions and Industrial Solutions.
Technology · Electronic Components · 90,000 employees
AVT vs TEL FAQ
Which is bigger, Avnet or TE Connectivity?
TE Connectivity (TEL) is larger, with a market capitalization of $61.64B compared with $8.40B for Avnet (AVT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AVT or TEL?
AVT returned +99.71% over the past 12 months, compared with -2.81% for TEL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AVT or TEL?
TEL has the lower trailing P/E at 20.9, versus 25.5 for AVT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Avnet or TE Connectivity?
Avnet has the higher yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.37% for TE Connectivity.
Are Avnet and TE Connectivity in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Electronic Components industry within the Technology sector.