MetaCap

Avery Dennison (AVY) vs TriMas (TRS)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Avery Dennison (AVY) has outperformed TriMas (TRS) over the past year, gaining 3.5% versus a gain of 2.9%. Over five years, TRS leads with a +21.7% price change compared with -20.4% for AVY. Avery Dennison is the larger company by market cap ($12.58 billion vs $1.37 billion), about 9.2 times the size.

On valuation, Avery Dennison trades at a lower forward P/E (14.8x vs 17.9x for TriMas). Avery Dennison offers the higher dividend yield (2.30% vs 0.42%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

AVY+3.47%TRS+2.88%
+24%+3%-18%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
AVY-19.25%TRS+16.16%
+39%-1%-41%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

AVY versus TRS key metrics
MetricAVYTRS
Share price$166.02$38.13
Market cap$12.58B$1.37B
1-day change-0.57%-0.31%
YTD return-8.20%+7.90%
1-year return+3.47%+2.88%
5-year return-20.40%+21.70%
P/E ratio (TTM)18.1815.50
Forward P/E14.8417.91
EPS (TTM)$9.13$2.46
Dividend yield2.30%0.42%
Annual dividend$3.82$0.16
Revenue (latest FY)$8.86B—
Revenue growth (YoY)+1.14%—
Net income (latest FY)$688.00M—
Gross margin28.75%—
Net margin7.77%—
52-week high$199.54$45.43
52-week low$152.42$30.43
Distance from 52-week high-16.80%-16.07%
Analyst consensusbuynone
Avg. price target upside+20.23%+18.02%
Average volume907.18K368.99K
Shares outstanding75.79M35.87M
Employees35,0002,500
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
IndustryContainers/PackagingIndustrial Specialties

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Avery Dennison is about 9.2 times larger than TriMas by market value ($12.58B vs $1.37B).
  • Avery Dennison offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.30% vs 0.42%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Avery Dennison in Consumer Discretionary and TriMas in Industrials.

About Avery Dennison

AVY stock →

Avery Dennison Corporation operates as a materials science and digital identification solutions company in the North America, Europe, the Middle East, North Africa, Asia, and Latin America. It offers pressure-sensitive label materials, which consist of papers, plastic films, and metal foils; performance tapes products, including mechanical fasteners, which are precision-extruded and injection-molded plastic devices; and other pressure-sensitive adhesive-based materials and converted products under the Fasson, JAC, and Avery Dennison brands.

Consumer Discretionary · Containers/Packaging · 35,000 employees

About TriMas

TRS stock →

TriMas Corporation engages in the design, development, manufacture, and sale of products for consumer products, aerospace and defense, and industrial markets worldwide. The company operates through Packaging and Specialty Products segments.

Industrials · Industrial Specialties · 2,500 employees

AVY vs TRS FAQ

Which is bigger, Avery Dennison or TriMas?

Avery Dennison (AVY) is larger, with a market capitalization of $12.58B compared with $1.37B for TriMas (TRS).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, AVY or TRS?

AVY returned +3.47% over the past 12 months, compared with +2.88% for TRS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, AVY or TRS?

TRS has the lower trailing P/E at 15.5, versus 18.2 for AVY. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Avery Dennison or TriMas?

Avery Dennison has the higher yield at 2.30%, compared with 0.42% for TriMas.

Are Avery Dennison and TriMas in the same industry?

No. Avery Dennison is in the Consumer Discretionary sector, while TriMas is in Industrials.

More comparisons