MetaCap

Alliancebernstein Global High Income Fund (AWF) vs Calamos Dynamic Convertible & Income Fund (CCD)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Alliancebernstein Global High Income Fund is the larger company by market cap ($822.6 million vs $675.3 million), about 1.2 times the size. On valuation, Calamos Dynamic Convertible & Income Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (2.8x vs 12.7x for Alliancebernstein Global High Income Fund). Alliancebernstein Global High Income Fund pays a dividend yielding 7.73%, while Calamos Dynamic Convertible & Income Fund does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

AWF versus CCD key metrics
MetricAWFCCD
Share price$9.54$23.60
Market cap$822.63M$675.28M
1-day change-0.93%-0.19%
P/E ratio (TTM)12.722.79
EPS (TTM)$0.75$8.45
Dividend yield7.73%9.93%
Annual dividend$0.737$0.00
52-week high$11.11$26.99
52-week low$9.48$19.99
Distance from 52-week high-14.13%-12.58%
Average volume300.96K64.20K
Shares outstanding86.23M28.62M
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryTrusts Except Educational Religious and CharitableTrusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Alliancebernstein Global High Income Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (12.7x vs 2.8x trailing P/E).
  • Calamos Dynamic Convertible & Income Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (9.93% vs 7.73%).

AWF vs CCD FAQ

Which is bigger, Alliancebernstein Global High Income Fund or Calamos Dynamic Convertible & Income Fund?

Alliancebernstein Global High Income Fund (AWF) is larger, with a market capitalization of $822.63M compared with $675.28M for Calamos Dynamic Convertible & Income Fund (CCD).

Which has the lower P/E ratio, AWF or CCD?

CCD has the lower trailing P/E at 2.8, versus 12.7 for AWF. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Alliancebernstein Global High Income Fund or Calamos Dynamic Convertible & Income Fund?

Calamos Dynamic Convertible & Income Fund has the higher yield at 9.93%, compared with 7.73% for Alliancebernstein Global High Income Fund.

Are Alliancebernstein Global High Income Fund and Calamos Dynamic Convertible & Income Fund in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons