Acuity (AYI) vs Griffon (GFF)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Griffon (GFF) has outperformed Acuity (AYI) over the past year, gaining 23.1% versus a loss of 13.4%. Over five years, GFF leads with a +261.8% price change compared with +44.6% for AYI. Acuity is the larger company by market cap ($8.95 billion vs $4.22 billion), about 2.1 times the size.
On valuation, Acuity trades at a lower forward P/E (12.8x vs 15.1x for Griffon). Griffon offers the higher dividend yield (0.91% vs 0.26%). Acuity converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 9.1% versus 2.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AYI | GFF |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $298.96 | $92.01 |
| Market cap | $8.95B | $4.22B |
| 1-day change | -0.49% | -2.12% |
| YTD return | -16.56% | +27.63% |
| 1-year return | -13.39% | +23.12% |
| 5-year return | +44.62% | +261.82% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 17.53 | 19.83 |
| Forward P/E | 12.84 | 15.09 |
| EPS (TTM) | $17.05 | $4.64 |
| Dividend yield | 0.26% | 0.91% |
| Annual dividend | $0.77 | $0.84 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $4.35B | $2.52B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +13.14% | -3.95% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $396.60M | $51.11M |
| Gross margin | 47.83% | 41.99% |
| Operating margin | 12.98% | 8.19% |
| Net margin | 9.13% | 2.03% |
| 52-week high | $380.17 | $108.57 |
| 52-week low | $257.04 | $65.01 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -21.36% | -15.25% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +26.88% | +38.03% |
| Average volume | 307.58K | 333.76K |
| Shares outstanding | 29.94M | 45.87M |
| Employees | 13,000 | 5,100 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Industrials |
| Industry | Building Products | Building Products |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Acuity is about 2.1 times larger than Griffon by market value ($8.95B vs $4.22B).
- GFF has outperformed AYI by 36.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Acuity is more profitable, keeping 9.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 2.0 cents for Griffon.
- Acuity grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+13.14% vs -3.95%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Acuity in Consumer Discretionary and Griffon in Industrials.
About Acuity
AYI stock →Acuity Inc. provides lighting, lighting controls, building management system, and an audio, video, and control platform in the United States and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Building Products · 13,000 employees
About Griffon
GFF stock →Griffon Corporation, through its subsidiaries, provides home and building, and consumer and professional products in the United States, Europe, Canada, Australia, and internationally. The Home and Building Products segment manufactures and markets residential and sectional commercial garage doors, rolling steel service doors, fire doors, shutters, steel security grilles, and room dividers.
Industrials · Building Products · 5,100 employees
AYI vs GFF FAQ
Which is bigger, Acuity or Griffon?
Acuity (AYI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $8.95B compared with $4.22B for Griffon (GFF).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AYI or GFF?
GFF returned +23.12% over the past 12 months, compared with -13.39% for AYI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AYI or GFF?
AYI has the lower trailing P/E at 17.5, versus 19.8 for GFF. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Acuity or Griffon?
Griffon has the higher yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.26% for Acuity.
Are Acuity and Griffon in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Building Products industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.