AZZ (AZZ) vs Smith & Nephew SNATS (SNN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
AZZ (AZZ) has outperformed Smith & Nephew SNATS (SNN) over the past year, gaining 31.8% versus a loss of 24.7%. Over five years, AZZ leads with a +159.9% price change compared with -24.0% for SNN. Smith & Nephew SNATS is the larger company by market cap ($11.14 billion vs $4.14 billion), about 2.7 times the size.
On valuation, Smith & Nephew SNATS trades at a lower forward P/E (11.0x vs 17.7x for AZZ). Smith & Nephew SNATS offers the higher dividend yield (1.49% vs 0.58%). AZZ converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 19.2% versus 10.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AZZ | SNN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $137.73 | $26.62 |
| Market cap | $4.14B | $11.14B |
| 1-day change | -0.46% | -0.97% |
| YTD return | +29.23% | -18.04% |
| 1-year return | +31.81% | -24.74% |
| 5-year return | +159.92% | -24.02% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 21.00 | 18.11 |
| Forward P/E | 17.67 | 11.04 |
| EPS (TTM) | $6.56 | $1.47 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 1.49% |
| Annual dividend | $0.80 | $0.397 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.65B | $6.16B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +4.58% | +6.09% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $317.26M | $625.00M |
| Gross margin | 23.94% | 68.01% |
| Operating margin | 16.04% | 12.88% |
| Net margin | 19.23% | 10.14% |
| 52-week high | $162.20 | $37.51 |
| 52-week low | $92.98 | $26.12 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -15.09% | -29.03% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +19.07% | +21.41% |
| Average volume | 259.38K | 1.66M |
| Shares outstanding | 30.05M | 418.52M |
| Employees | 3,767 | 17,000 |
| Sector | Industrials | Health Care |
| Industry | Industrial Specialties | Industrial Specialties |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Smith & Nephew SNATS is about 2.7 times larger than AZZ by market value ($11.14B vs $4.14B).
- AZZ has outperformed SNN by 56.6 percentage points over the past year.
- AZZ is more profitable, keeping 19.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 10.1 cents for Smith & Nephew SNATS.
- The two companies sit in different sectors: AZZ in Industrials and Smith & Nephew SNATS in Health Care.
About AZZ
AZZ stock →AZZ Inc. provides hot-dip galvanizing and coil coating solutions in North America.
Industrials · Industrial Specialties · 3,767 employees
About Smith & Nephew SNATS
SNN stock →Smith & Nephew plc, together with its subsidiaries, develops, manufactures, markets, and sells medical devices and services in the United Kingdom, the United States, and internationally. The company operates in three segments: Orthopaedics, Sports Medicine & ENT, and Advanced Wound Management.
Health Care · Industrial Specialties · 17,000 employees
AZZ vs SNN FAQ
Which is bigger, AZZ or Smith & Nephew SNATS?
Smith & Nephew SNATS (SNN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $11.14B compared with $4.14B for AZZ (AZZ).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AZZ or SNN?
AZZ returned +31.81% over the past 12 months, compared with -24.74% for SNN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AZZ or SNN?
SNN has the lower trailing P/E at 18.1, versus 21.0 for AZZ. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, AZZ or Smith & Nephew SNATS?
Smith & Nephew SNATS has the higher yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.58% for AZZ.
Are AZZ and Smith & Nephew SNATS in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Specialties industry within the Industrials sector.