Alibaba Group (BABA) vs RELX (RELX)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
RELX (RELX) has outperformed Alibaba Group (BABA) over the past year, losing 24.0% versus a loss of 39.7%. Over five years, RELX leads with a +14.5% price change compared with -35.0% for BABA. Alibaba Group is the larger company by market cap ($262.68 billion vs $60.15 billion), about 4.4 times the size.
On valuation, Alibaba Group trades at a lower forward P/E (11.4x vs 16.0x for RELX). Alibaba Group offers the higher dividend yield (6.86% vs 1.99%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BABA | RELX |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $105.59 | $34.62 |
| Market cap | $262.68B | $60.15B |
| 1-day change | -1.32% | +0.28% |
| YTD return | -25.46% | -14.60% |
| 1-year return | -39.75% | -24.03% |
| 5-year return | -34.96% | +14.49% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 25.57 | 20.73 |
| Forward P/E | 11.44 | 16.02 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.13 | $1.67 |
| Dividend yield | 6.86% | 1.99% |
| Annual dividend | $7.24 | $0.689 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $148.40B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +8.09% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $15.02B | — |
| Gross margin | 39.81% | — |
| Operating margin | 4.90% | — |
| Net margin | 10.12% | — |
| 52-week high | $182.50 | $47.22 |
| 52-week low | $91.99 | $27.57 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -42.14% | -26.69% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +75.66% | +54.12% |
| Average volume | 10.46M | 2.35M |
| Shares outstanding | 2.49B | 1.74B |
| Employees | 132,165 | 37,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Business Services | Business Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Alibaba Group is about 4.4 times larger than RELX by market value ($262.68B vs $60.15B).
- RELX has outperformed BABA by 15.7 percentage points over the past year.
- Alibaba Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.86% vs 1.99%).
About Alibaba Group
BABA stock →Alibaba Group Holding Limited, through its subsidiaries, provides technology infrastructure and marketing reach to help merchants, brands, retailers, and other businesses in the People's Republic of China and internationally. It operates through the Alibaba China E-Commerce Group, Alibaba International Digital Commerce Group, Cloud Intelligence Group, and All Others segments.
Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 132,165 employees
About RELX
RELX stock →RELX PLC, together with its subsidiaries, provides information-based analytics and decision tools for professional and business customers in North America, Europe, and internationally. It operates through four segments: Risk; Scientific, Technical & Medical; Legal; and Exhibitions.
Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 37,000 employees
BABA vs RELX FAQ
Which is bigger, Alibaba Group or RELX?
Alibaba Group (BABA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $262.68B compared with $60.15B for RELX (RELX).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BABA or RELX?
RELX returned -24.03% over the past 12 months, compared with -39.75% for BABA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BABA or RELX?
RELX has the lower trailing P/E at 20.7, versus 25.6 for BABA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Alibaba Group or RELX?
Alibaba Group has the higher yield at 6.86%, compared with 1.99% for RELX.
Are Alibaba Group and RELX in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Business Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.