Brunswick (BC) vs ESAB (ESAB)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Brunswick (BC) has outperformed ESAB (ESAB) over the past year, gaining 0.6% versus a loss of 42.8%. ESAB is the larger company by market cap ($4.17 billion vs $4.11 billion), about 1.0 times the size. On valuation, ESAB trades at a lower forward P/E (10.4x vs 11.7x for Brunswick).
Brunswick offers the higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 0.63%). ESAB converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.0% versus -2.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BC | ESAB |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $63.36 | $67.12 |
| Market cap | $4.11B | $4.17B |
| 1-day change | -2.49% | -6.56% |
| YTD return | -14.66% | -39.92% |
| 1-year return | +0.57% | -42.83% |
| 5-year return | -36.88% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 20.91 |
| Forward P/E | 11.69 | 10.35 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-1.32 | $3.21 |
| Dividend yield | 2.75% | 0.63% |
| Annual dividend | $1.74 | $0.42 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $5.36B | $2.84B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +2.40% | +3.71% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-137.30M | $226.77M |
| Gross margin | 24.84% | 36.88% |
| Operating margin | -0.76% | 14.50% |
| Net margin | -2.56% | 7.98% |
| 52-week high | $90.25 | $137.42 |
| 52-week low | $58.56 | $64.83 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -29.80% | -51.16% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +44.62% | +89.08% |
| Average volume | 732.67K | 816.80K |
| Shares outstanding | 64.80M | 62.14M |
| Employees | 14,000 | 10,300 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Industrial Machinery/Components | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- BC has outperformed ESAB by 43.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Brunswick offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 0.63%).
- ESAB is more profitable, keeping 8.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -2.6 cents for Brunswick.
About Brunswick
BC stock →Brunswick Corporation designs, manufactures, and markets recreation products in the United States, Europe, the Asia-Pacific, Canada, and internationally. The company operates through four segments: Propulsion, Engine P&A, Navico Group, and Boat.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 14,000 employees
About ESAB
ESAB stock →ESAB Corporation engages in the formulation, development, manufacture, and supply of consumable products and equipment for use in cutting, joining, automated welding, and gas control equipment. It offers its products through independent distributors and direct salespeople.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 10,300 employees
BC vs ESAB FAQ
Which is bigger, Brunswick or ESAB?
ESAB (ESAB) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.17B compared with $4.11B for Brunswick (BC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BC or ESAB?
BC returned +0.57% over the past 12 months, compared with -42.83% for ESAB (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Brunswick or ESAB?
Brunswick has the higher yield at 2.75%, compared with 0.63% for ESAB.
Are Brunswick and ESAB in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.